法的立場より見た天皇の戦争責任
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This thesis consists of four parts:(1)preface, (2)responsibility for war of the Emperor viewed from the standpoint of constitutional law, (3)responsibility for war of the Emperor viewed from the standpoint of international law, (4)conclusion. Prof. Hasegawa places constitutional responsibility on World War II for the Emperor in his thesis. But his opinion is wrong, because the Meiji Constitution adopts a principle of irresponsibility of a monarch after the examples of foreign constitutional monarchies. Prof. Hoshino places responsibility of international law on World War II for the Emperor in his thesis. But his opinion is wrong, because we can not find such grounds in Art. 227 of the Versailles Treaty in 1920 and also in Cl. 10 of the Potsdam Declaration.
- 日本法政学会の論文
- 1987-05-20
日本法政学会 | 論文
- 任意後見の濫用防止とセーフガード : 英国における「ベスト・インタレスト」尊重の取り組み
- 『戦後社会保障制度における生存権保障の一波紋』 : 堀木訴訟控訴審判決における憲法二五条一項・二項分離解釈論
- 二〇〇三年衆議院総選挙におけるマニフェストを巡る諸問題について
- シンポジウム 「家族の変貌と暴力」(シンポジウム2)
- ドイツにおける「親権」の最近の動向 : 懲戒権と児童虐待の視点から