箕面忠魂碑訴訟判決の問題点
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Mino City moved a cenotaph to a public place at public expense and some public officials attended the memorial service held there by a society of the war bereaved. It was disputed whether this fact conflicted with the principle of the separation of religion and politics provided by the Japanese constitution or not. "Kosaki"court decided that it was unconstitutional. In my opinion, "Kosaki"decision mistakes at the next three points. (1)It is inconsistent logically and also conflict with the judicial precident of the Supreme Court. (2)It is contrary to common sense of the world that offer prayers publicly for the sake of the spirit of the war dead. (3)It is filled with ignorance and prejuddice on "Shinto"which is the most excellent spiritual culture of Japan.
- 日本法政学会の論文
- 1984-05-20
日本法政学会 | 論文
- 任意後見の濫用防止とセーフガード : 英国における「ベスト・インタレスト」尊重の取り組み
- 『戦後社会保障制度における生存権保障の一波紋』 : 堀木訴訟控訴審判決における憲法二五条一項・二項分離解釈論
- 二〇〇三年衆議院総選挙におけるマニフェストを巡る諸問題について
- シンポジウム 「家族の変貌と暴力」(シンポジウム2)
- ドイツにおける「親権」の最近の動向 : 懲戒権と児童虐待の視点から