摂関院政期の明法家と王朝国家 : 中世公家訴訟制度成立史の一視角
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The final goal of this report is to clarify the conversion of the judicial official function as well. as to identify its causes between the ancient and the medieval ages periods in Japan. Its conclusions run as follows. The main function of judicial officials in the Sekkan Period was to submit names of crimes. A system appeared, in which judicial officials, receiving directions by Imperial command, reported the names of crimes to the Dajohkan. Then, the Jinnosadame decided the names of crimes according to their reports. This means they were the de facto law enforcement agency of the Imperial Administration. Therefore, the government decision of names of crimes required their reports in principle. Another function of judicial officials in this period was to answer legal questions which government agencies asked in order to fulfil their tasks. This second function was gradually expanded to be used by private sectors after the eleventh century. The functions of judicial officials greatly changed in the Insei Period. First, the procedure of submitting names of crimes was gradually formalized. Second, and more importantly, they were coming to have the full-scale function of reporting the merits of lawsuits and disputes. The cause of the latter change is that in this period lawsuits and disputes concerning land beyond the framework of provinces were occurring so frequently. Given that these judicial officials had answered questions on legal principles in the previous period, parties litigant generally came to them for advice. On the basis of this tendency, the Imperial Administration put the reporting function of judicial officials into the national system of lawsuits decisions. Each man of power did the same. This brought about the direct rule of court nobles in the Insei period over the function of judicial officials as law enforcement agencies ; and moreover, accelerated the establishment of the lawsuit decision system, that is, the establishment of the Kirokujo on a larger scale. The Kirokujo was founded as the organization which gathered working officials, including judicial officials who functioned as judicial officials. When we see the Kirokujo and its successor, Fudono, as located in the center of the medieval aristocratic lawsuit system, the reorganization of judicial officials must be assessed as its very beginning.
- 財団法人史学会の論文
- 1986-11-20
著者
関連論文
- 河内祥輔著, 『日本中世の朝廷・幕府体制』, 吉川弘文館, 二〇〇七・六刊, A5, 三四九頁, 九〇〇〇円
- 下郡 剛著, 『後白河院政の研究』, 吉川弘文館, 一九九九・八刊, A5, 二七六頁, 七五〇〇円
- 美川 圭著 『院政の研究』 (臨川書店 一九九六・一一刊 A5 二八五頁 七〇〇〇円)
- 鎌倉期役夫工米の賦課と免除 : 中世前期国家財政の一側面
- 上横手雅敬監修/井上満郎・杉橋隆夫編『古代・中世の政治と文化』 : 思文閣出版 一九九四・四刊 A5 六八四頁
- 工藤敬一著『荘園公領制の成立と内乱』(思文閣史学叢書)
- 鎌倉幕府と官職制度 : 成功制を中心に
- 日本 : 中世 二(一九八九年の歴史学界 : 回顧と展望)
- 加能史料編纂委員会編『加能史料 平安IV』, 石川県, 一九八九・三刊, A5, 八七二頁
- 摂関院政期の明法家と王朝国家 : 中世公家訴訟制度成立史の一視角
- 西田友広著, 『鎌倉幕府の検断と国制』, 吉川弘文館, 二〇一一・八刊, A5, 二八八頁, 九〇〇〇円