豊臣政権期島津氏の蔵入地と軍役体制
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
It is well known that, in the process of Toyotomi Hideyoshi's (秀吉) invasion of Korea, various feudal lords (daimyo 大名) were subjected to a consolidated military service levy based on the annual output in terms of rice (kokudaka 石高) of their domains. In this essay, the author will take up the process of how daimyo, who had not yet dismantled the castles and forts, built within their domains by warlords, during the previous Sengoku period (1467-1568), were able to muster the great amount of men and provisions for the Korean expedition. For this purpose, the Shimazu Family (島津氏) of Kyushu (九州), who played a leading role in the invasion, will be taken as a case in point. Actually, the Shimazu Family was not able to provide a military force for the initial maneuvers involved in the first expedition to Korea (1592-1595), and was, therefore, called upon to carry "Japan's greatest follow-up campaign." For this purpose, a land survey was carried out by a Toyotomi functionary, Ishida Mitsunari (石田三成), with an aim to significantly increase the directly held domains of the Shimazu Family. However, such a plan was nipped in the bud due to the resistance, forthcome from various classes of Shimazu subjects in response to the re-apportionment of fiefs effected by the Ishida survey. As a result, 78,000 koku 石 of the Shimazu holdings, valued at a total 200,000 koku, went into fallow due to an insuffiicience of cultivators. What this all means is that the original intent of Hideyoshi's land surveys (Taiko Kenchi 太閤検地), that is, the creation of direct daimyo holdings capable of satisfying the need for military provisions, as well as the formation of an enfeoffed entourage capable to shoulder the burden of military service, were, in a word, thwarted. Being unable to answer the call to arms, and faced with possible relocation out of Kyushu or even fall from daimyo status, the Shimazu were driven to expediency. Therefore, with promises of fief appropriations, they demanded such groups as locally based samurais (jizamurai 地侍) within their domains and direct vassals desiring additions in their holdings, to stand as the Shimazu force for the invasion of Korea. This demand was answered by a self-provisioned army, composed of such people as the former vassals of families, who had previously opposed the Shimazu and had fallen, vassals who had lost a good portion of their fiefs as a result of the Shimazu's pledge of allegiance to the Toyotomi Family, and local samurais who had been amassing military power while pracficing agricultural management. While, on the surface, the military forces under the Toyotomi regime were to be supported by funds from the public coffers, in the case of the Shimazu Family, whose direct holdings were incapable of provisioning a standing army, it to muster all voluntary self-provisioned force was the only possible alternative. In this very fact lies the proof to negate the conventionally held opinion that the military forces mustered by the Shimazu Family and other families of daimyo status for the Korean expeditions, were standing armies of military men completely separated from agricultural activities (heino bunri 兵農分離). Despite being the object of a thorough cadastre carried out by the central regime, the Shimazu domains still widely maintained local samurai status holders unremoved from agrarian responsibilities ; and rather than daimyo power working to negate these soldier-farmers, it actually strove to garner their support in meeting the military service demanded by the Toyotomi regime. Later, between the years 1611 and 1614, the Shimazu were to carry out their own land surveys and promulgate (in 1611) a set of restrictions ordering the separation of soldier and peasant. However, despite this, some of samurai rank throughout the Tokugawa feudal (bakuhan 幕藩) system still, in rare cases, set up camp in agrarian villages, and took the lead in agricultural management. In the case of the Shimazu land
- 財団法人史学会の論文
- 1983-06-20
著者
関連論文
- 将軍さまの図書館 「紅葉山文庫」という徳川家の財産 (特集 江戸城--その空間と権力の見取り図)
- 歴史史料と文学作品 (特集 十七世紀の文学)
- 金は天下の回りもの 吉原をめぐるお金の話 (特集 江戸吉原(part 2)聖と俗、光と影の人模様。)
- 特集セミナー Q&A 将軍家・御三家・御三卿の基礎知識 (特集 徳川一族 将軍家 御三家 御三卿 実紀)
- 講演記録 将軍たちの余暇 (特集 江戸の余暇を探る)
- 『江戸時代年表』監修者に聞く 江戸に思いを馳せる至福の時間を
- 大日本近世史料 廣橋兼胤公武御用日記八 (史料編纂 刊行物紹介)
- 往復書状3000通 細川家、情報戦を制す (熊本城築城400年記念特集 細川家 美と戦いの700年)
- 入門セミナー これだけは知っておきたい江戸時代の対外関係 江戸の外交Q&A (特集 世界のなかの江戸JAPAN)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第17回)老中病にかかった譜代大名たち
- "日本人力"を磨く静かなブーム 江戸文化トリビア30問
- 幕府大奥と薩摩藩奥の交際について : 「薩摩藩奥女中文書」の考察
- 対談 諸田玲子×山本博文 将軍を操った女たち (特集 江戸城 大奥--将軍が生まれ、育ち、夜ごとに通う女の園)
- 江戸大奥いじめ物語 "お局さま"は新人転がしが大好き (特集 大人もいじめに苦しんでいる)
- 武士文学としての『秘書』 (特集 さむらいの文学)
- 島津家文書の内部構造の研究
- 新発見の小浜酒井家文書
- 近世初期の老中発給文書と月番制
- 佐々木 潤之介著『幕藩制国家論』上、下
- 豊臣政権期島津氏の蔵入地と軍役体制
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(最終回)吉宗時代の老中
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第16回)老中と側用人
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第15回)老中の城地
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第14回)家光政権と老中制の成立
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第13回)秀忠大御所時代の年寄たち
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(12)秀忠政権の年寄たち
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第11回)初代老中本多家のその後
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第10回)大久保家の復権
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第9回)老中昇進コースの変遷(3)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第8回)老中昇進コースの変遷(2)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(第7回)老中昇進コースの変遷(1)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(6)老中を出す家
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(5)老中の仕事
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(4)徳川四天王のその後(4)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(3)徳川四天王のその後(3)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(2)徳川四天王のその後(2)
- お殿様たちの出世--江戸幕府老中への道(1)徳川四天王のその後(1)
- 外国人の見た日本人 (あっ晴れ!おかやま国文祭 第25回国民文化祭・おかやま2010 洋学シンポジウム報告 江戸時代の国際文化交流--洋学・異国人・異国船)
- 三宅正浩「幕藩政治秩序の成立--大名家からみた家光政権」 (二〇一〇年度日本史研究会大会報告批判)
- そこが聞きたい! Q&A 江戸時代の天皇と公家--山口和夫、松澤克行、山本博文氏に聞く (特集 江戸時代の天皇・公家)
- 参勤交代と山陽道の宿駅 ([交通史研究会]シンポジウム報告 山陽道矢掛宿の歴史と現代)
- ペリーが見た日本人の特性
- 批判と反省 秀吉文書の「自敬表現」および刀狩令について : 三鬼清一郎氏の批判に答える
- 家康の天下取りの教科書「吾妻鏡」 : 家康はなぜ信長や秀吉でなく、頼朝の記録「吾妻鏡」を愛読したのか (歴史特集 日本史に学ぶ危機の時代のリーダー) -- (総力特集 信長か、頼朝か : 今、求められるリーダーは誰か)
- 巻頭史論 なぜ、「三百藩」と呼ばれるのか (2012年3月号特集 三百藩藩主列伝)
- 『天地明察』公開記念・特別対談 山本博文×堀口茉純 季節と式日でみる徳川将軍家の日常生活 (特集 知っておきたい旧暦の楽しみ方)
- 『敗者の日本史』刊行記念対談 敗れた側からみえる歴史像