大宝令制太政官の成立をめぐって

概要

論文の詳細を見る
The author examines the accounts of Shoku-Nihongi contained in the columns of August the 21st, 700, February the 6th, 724, and March the 22nd, 724. This article, which gives a supplementary explanation to the author's former article, runs as follows. (1)It seems that the Dajokan under the Kiyomigahara-Ryo was scarcely invested with the power of deliberating on national affairs. (2)On the other hand, the Giseikan (Council) in the Dajokan system under the Taiho-Ryo was empowered to draft and discuss bills, and it was also authorized to make laws independently. (3)It is also assumed that the Giseikan was invested with the power of deliberating even on imperial edicts. (4)This growth of the power and function of the Giseikan resulted from the consistent efforts that the nobles in Kinai had made to enlarge their influence on national affairs. (5)Therefore the Dajokan system under the Taiho-Ryo was a compromise measure which the crown proposed to such nobles. However the crown didn't fail to devise other measures to counteract their political growth. The title of Dajotenno (abdicated emperor) was enacted, and the office of Chidajokanji (extra chief minister) was established. (6)Considering the process of their establishent, the Dajokan and Giseikan system under the Taiho-Ryo was essentially hostile to the imperial authority.
公益財団法人史学会の論文
1979-10-20