幕藩権力と寺檀関係 : 一家一寺制をめぐって
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The problem of relationships between temples and their patrons (Jidan寺檀relationships), and the Jidan system is one of the most important subjects in the research or religion during the Tokugawa period, because has not only this system been regarded as the most important feature of religious policy, but also the relationships characterize Buddhism sects, temples, and priests. However, the meaning of the policy has yet to be clarified, although it has been recognized as an important issue. In order to make the meaning concretely clear, legal acts and precedents must be analyzed or re-analyzed and case studies carried out on jidan relationships. In this article, the author has analyzed and reanalyzed particularly about laws related to the "one household-one temple institution" (ikka-ichiji-sei一家一寺制), an institution demanding that every member of a household must be a patron of one temple. At first, the "one household-one temple institution" was not stated legally. The Tokugawa government locally enforced laws that lead to the "one household-one temple institution" from the mid-18th century. And, in 1827, the government locally declared that the "one household-one temple institution" was proper. However, this declaration was a reaction to the actual situation rather than positive policy. Then, in the Shibata新発田 domain, from the end of the 18th century, the local government enforced laws that lead to the "one household-one temple institution", to prevent trouble concerning jidan relationships and carry out the registration of community members more smoothly. However, in 1828, the Shibata government enforced a version of the Tokugawa government's 1827 law, consequently legitimating the "one household-one temple institution". The author concludes that laws related to the "one household-one temple institution" were reactions to actual conditions. In disputes over jidan relationships, any agreement among the litigants was respected by political authorities. So, contrary to previous researches, it is difficult to consider that these laws were enacted with positive political intensions, such as to control the formation and the condition of households.
- 財団法人史学会の論文
- 2001-04-20
著者
関連論文
- 寺檀制度に関する通念の形成--一家一寺制法令再論
- 五 文化・思想(近世)(日本)
- 米原市柏原成菩提院所蔵史料の紹介と解説
- 寺元慣行をめぐって (地域社会と基層信仰) -- (第二部 基層信仰の諸相)
- 諸徳寺村永命寺末寺引直し一件 (大原幽学と東総村落社会 共同研究 地域社会・文化の諸相と基層信仰) -- (大原幽学と性学教団)
- 田中秀和「幕末維新期における宗教と地域社会」
- 半檀家論の再検討
- 近世史部会共同研究報告批判 (二〇〇八年度日本史研究会大会報告批判)
- 近世仏教をめぐる通念の醸成 (特集=創られる伝説--歴史意識と説話) -- (トポスと歴史意識・伝説)
- 書評と紹介 和田幸司著『浄土真宗と部落寺院の展開』
- 「島津家本」の構成と形成過程
- 半檀家論の再検討(研究発表)(第二会場(近世))(日本史部会)
- 幕藩権力と寺檀関係 : 一家一寺制をめぐって
- 近世中後期における在地寺院の運営をめぐって : 関東・新義真言宗を中心に
- 近世後期における寺檀関係と檀家組織 : 下越後真宗優勢地帯を事例として
- 書評 澤博勝『近世宗教社会論』
- 幕藩権力と寺檀関係--一家一寺制をめぐって