異質令集解の史料価値について

概要

論文の詳細を見る
In the Ryo-no-Shuge in its present form are three volumes called the Ishitsu-Ryo-no-Shuge (異質令集解) which have a different commentary from that found elsewhere in the Ryo-no-Shuge (令集解). The authors of this article have examined the Ryo-no-Shuge to determine the value of the Ishitsu-Ryo-no-Shuge as research material for historians. This study has led the authors to the following conclusions : 1.The Ishitsu-Ryo-no-Shuge is in fact a compilation -but it is not the Ryo-shiki (令私記) written by Myoboka (明法家). 2.It originally was a commentary on a whole body of Ryo different from the Ryo-no-Shuge. 3.It was not said to have been compiled to make up for deficiencies in the Ryo-no-Shuge. 4.Its contents led the two authors of this article to conclude that it was compiled sometime in the early Heian Period. 5.It was used for the purpose of supplementing gaps in the Ryo-no-Shuge from the first year of Heiji (平治) (1159) to the first year of Bun'o (文応) (1260). By studying the relationship between the Ishitsu-Ryo-no-Shuge and similar commentaries the authors come to the tentative conclusion that the Ryo-no-Shuge was based on either a book which had been compiled to edit the Ryo-Ritsu-Mondo-Shiki (令律問答私記) which Nukada-no-Imatari (額田今足) had advised or on the Ryo-no-Gige (令義解) which had enlarged it.
財団法人史学会の論文
1977-10-20