体育学の対象と学的基礎
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
To give the sciences on physical education an assured status, it is premised on a conceptual grasp of physical education in itself. But physical education has been confused with sport conceptually. This means it cannot be regarded as scientifically estab1ished. As the conceptual base of physical education is derived from 'education', its categorical basis consists in relation', whereas a genus of sport is 'culture' that has a categorical basis of 'substance'. They are the disparate concept that cannot have an overlap each other. Namely conceptual substitution physical education for sport is impossible. For establishment of specialty as science, first of all, our distinctive comprehension of these concepts will be required. Although physical educat1on researchers mix up practical knowing (phronesis) with theoretical knowledge frequently, it is crucial to differentiate clearly between the two matters also. Empirical knowing is of significance for practice but doesn't automatically mean to be researches. Scientific work obviously requires inter-subjectively testable objectivity and falsifiability (Popper). The origins of actual influences in scientific knowledge are based on a rational explanation of fact and prediction of unforeknown fact (Carnap). Therefore the sciences on physical education too must pursue not a mere object but the objectivity that everyone recognizes the validity of an argument. Academizing our studies, the subjects of inquiry for physical education must be argued not only generally and logically, but also falsifiably. Such learned accomplishments will be able to obtain the above objectivity as requirement for research. Then our sciences will acquire social significance and recognition from that its scientific force arises.
- 社団法人日本体育学会の論文
- 1999-11-10
著者
関連論文
- 004K10003 人間存在における身体性の文化的多様性 : 多様性の発現機序と運動形式(00.体育原理,一般研究発表)
- 体育学における哲学的研究の課題と二十一世紀への展望)(第50回大会キーノートレクチャー:体育原理)
- 体育学の対象と学的基礎
- 身体のテオーリアー(1) : 身体論の歴史・方法・意義