清野博士の日本人種論に關する疑義, 清野謙次・杉山繁輝・三宅宗悦・中山英司著, 『古代人骨の研究に基く日本人種論』, 昭和 24 年 8 月, 岩波書店發行, 本文 : A4 判, 620 頁, 圖譜 : A3 判, 90 葉, 帙入, 720 部限定, 5,000 圓
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
According to Dr. Kiyono, the modern Japanese are the result of physical change, having developed out of a prehistortc type, through a protohistoric intermediate type, with some Korean admixture. The Ainu, being different from the peoples either of prehistoric or protohistoric periods, had nothing to do with the formation of the modern Japanese. These conclusions are said to be derived, with statistical procedures, from a survey of skeletons of all those periods. Thus, if there were defects in his chronology of skeletons and his anthropometrical methods, his conclusions would be questionable. In the first place, because of insufficient description of the excavations and the relation to other relics excavated, the chronology of skeletons is ambiguous. Furthermore, several errors can be pointed out. In the second place, there are defects in his anthropometric methods. When measurements are compared, the characteristics compared are not always of the same kind, and therefore the basis of comparison fluctuates. The "mittlere Typendifferenz" is calculated only between the most convenient materials, and general conclusions are drawn in spite of the fact that the interrelations between all materials have not been exhaustively worked out. On the basis of Dr. Kiyono's own anthropometrical data, the reviewers have calculated the "Typendiffirenz" between all materials exhaustively, and reached the following results : 1) Though Dr. Kiyono concludes that the difference between the modern Japanese and their adjacent peoples is greater than that between local types of the modern Japanese, his evidence, especially with reference to the relation of the modern Japanese to the Koreans and Northern Chinese, cannot be validated. 2) On the basis of Dr. Kiyono's anthropometrical data, the Ainu, rather than the protohistoric Japanese, would more probably be regarded as the intermediate type between the modern Japanese and the prehistoric people. 3) Statistical evidence as to the mixture with the Koreans is lacking. In short, even provided that the chronology of materials were exact, it would be impossible to draw Dr. Kiyono's own conclusions from his own statistics.
- 日本文化人類学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- 人類学概説,石田英一郎・寺田和夫・石川栄吉著,日本評論新社,昭和33年7月,定価800円,296頁
- ルース・ベネディクト著, 志村義雄譯, 『民族 : その科学と政治性』, 1950 年 4 月, 再版 1951 年 3 月, 北隆館刊, B6 判, 15+273 頁, 索引 8 頁, 300 円, 再版 220 円
- 清野博士の日本人種論に關する疑義, 清野謙次・杉山繁輝・三宅宗悦・中山英司著, 『古代人骨の研究に基く日本人種論』, 昭和 24 年 8 月, 岩波書店發行, 本文 : A4 判, 620 頁, 圖譜 : A3 判, 90 葉, 帙入, 720 部限定, 5,000 圓
- 須田昭義編, 『人類学読本』, 東京, みすず書房, 1963, 208p., 700 円
- 形質と文化
- 日本人の起源
- 形質人類學はどこへ行く