後北条領国下の徳政問題 : 永禄三年徳政令を中心に
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this article is to investigate the historical meaning of the moratorium acts made by sengoku daimyo Gohojo in 1560. During the Middle Ages, the peasants would demand the moratorium acts at the time when the candidate succeeded to Tenno, Shogun, Lord. 1560 was the year when HOJO Ujimasa succeeded to sengoku daimyo. At that time the peasants in Gohojo ryokoku demanded that they didn't need to pay nengukuji only by money, zeni, and that they could rescind the debts, etc. These peasants' revolts prevailed over Gohojo ryokoku. Facing to these big revolts, the Gohojo couldn't but enforce the moratorium acts. They included the following contents, (1)The peasants could bring back their wives and children who had been serving their terms, (2)The peasants didn't need to pay their debts, (3)The peasants could get back their patches which had been lended for a period. But on the other hand, it could be applied in the following cases, because if the acts had been applied in these cases, Gohojo's rule of the peasants might have been destroyed, (1)Apart of nengu which was taken after by daikan and bugyo, (2)Kurazeni lended by the Gohojo, etc. And it is worth paying more attention to the fact that these acts included also the ptovision which meant that while paying nengu, the peasants could substitute rice for a half of it. The Gohojo put both tax reform and rescinding the debts into excution at the same time by these moratorium acts. This is how they could emphasize that they made wise administration for the peasants revolts. This point is the most important political meaning in these moratorium acts.
- 1989-03-31
著者
関連論文
- 後北条領国下の徳政問題 : 永禄三年徳政令を中心に
- 中世史研究における協業--「あるく中世」と荘園調査 (特集 地方史研究における協業)
- 教科書は最良の概説書か
- 中世史料刊行の現状に思う
- 『国史大辞典』と私
- 戦国期「国郡境目相論」について (特集 戦争の中世社会史)
- 大名領国下における年貢収取と村落 (1993年度歴史学研究会大会報告--歴史のなかの情報) -- (中世史部会--中世における地域・身分・権力〔含 討論要旨〕)
- 日本中世史 (卒業論文をどう書くか) -- (史資料・文献のさがし方)
- 中世東国の水運史研究をめぐって (中・近世移行期をめぐって)