Is the Experiment of Wu and Shaknov an Empirical Illustration of the Paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen?
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Bohm and Aharonov interpreted the experiment of Wu and Shaknov as an empirical evidence of the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. Peres and Singer tried to deny their interpretation, but they were refuted by the former. It is shown that their reasoning for the interpretation is still unsatisfactory.
- 理論物理学刊行会の論文
- 1972-12-25
著者
関連論文
- Critical Comment on the Nonexistence of the Charge Superselection Rule
- On Subsidiary Condition in Quantum Theory of Non-Abelian Gauge Fields
- Spontaneous Breaking of Chiral Symmetry in a Vector-Gluon Model. II
- Inconsistency of a Theory Including Different Kinds of Hidden Variables
- Is the Experiment of Wu and Shaknov an Empirical Illustration of the Paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen?