合理的受容可能性と真理
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In “From Alethic Anti-realism to Alethic Realism” Künne distinguishes between alethic realism and alethic anti-realism. This article examines whether or not alethic anti-realism is appropriate, when we take the position of using common sense to settle a philosophical problem. To that end, I will first review Künnes theory. Next, I will point out that Putnams natural realists are alethic realists, that Wrights moderate internalists are alethic ani-realists, and that Wright argues against Putnam. Then, I will argue that Künnes conception of truth escapes the criticism of Wrights argument. Lastly I will also review Tennants argument for anti-realism, and argue that in spite of Tennants argument, alethic anti-realism is not appropriate when considered from a commonsense point of view.
- 科学基礎論学会の論文
- 2007-12-25