Comparative Study between GBAS and Conventional Aircraft Precision Approach Guidance System
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Since the ICAO decided to adopt the GNSS-based CNS/ATM as a future standard navigation system, there has been much research to guarantee the required navigation performance of CNS/ATM sub-systems (GBAS, SBAS, etc.), mainly in the integrity or continuity aspect. However, it is also important to study the interoperability and natural transition between the old and new nav-aids because of their very different features. Therefore, we focused on the verification of the performance of the new systems, especially GBAS, through comparison with conventional aircraft landing guidance systems such as ILS. For performance verification, we developed the GBAS system and conducted three types of ground tests and several flight tests. In the analysis of the test data, we compared the GBAS navigation solutions with the data collected from the ILS inspection device — Theodolite. From the analysis, we concluded that the developed GBAS system satisfied the Precision Approach Category I requirements in the aspect of accuracy, and was consistent with the conventional aircraft precision approach guidance system.
- 2004-02-04
著者
-
Kee Changdon
School Of Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University
-
Yun Youngsun
School Of Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University
-
PARK Sungmin
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University
関連論文
- Comparative Study between GBAS and Conventional Aircraft Precision Approach Guidance System
- Extending Operational Area of Pseudolite Using Long Integration Time and Data-less Pseudolites
- A Particle Filter Approach to DGNSS Integrity Monitoring : Consideration of Non-Gaussian Error Distribution
- Analysis of GNSS Signal Acquisition Methods for the Bit-Transition Problem for a Single Code Period