タイトル無し
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
1. The writer considers this symposium to be an attempt to find out a new methodology for the study of family in the sociology of education. He is rather skeptical if there are any educational-sociological methods as such. Any method, he thinks, can be educational-sociological so far as it is adopted by the researcher with a view to contributing to the improvement of education through a sociological study.<BR>2. The sociology of education is indeed a sociological study of educational phenomena, and should be approached as objectively as possible, that is, free from any dogmatic creeds or prejudices. But it is also a study of education by a sociological researcher with a clear awareness of his final contribution to the improvement of educational poblems. He is requested to have a perspective in mind in which he connects his present stu-dy with the historical realities of education, although this never means. that his study should be made with a sense of hasty applicability.<BR>The socializing functions of the family are an important area of education, but a mere sociological study of it does not prove educational-sociological unless the researcher is fully conscious of this kind of perspective.<BR>3. In the correlational method so common in sociological studies, the researcher, who tries to find a possible relationship between, for example, a child-rearing practice and the occupation of the family, is tempted to treat these variables separately as if they were two different items. But the truth is that he is only analyzing one and the same social entity, the social class, in terms of its two cultural aspects. The wholeness is given first, the reality is presented before him undivided, and the researcher is to analyze it from various aspects. In such an analysis, qualitative data are as important as the quantitative. This also suggests that the historical realities of education do not exist apart from the realm of sociological studies, and that a researcher in the sociology of education is requested to start his study with an analysis of this given entity rather than to make a sociological study and then try to connect it with educational needs.
- 日本教育社会学会の論文
日本教育社会学会 | 論文
- 2.大学進学と意識変容 : 都市/地方進学校の卒業後パネル調査から(III-9部会 高大連携,研究発表III)
- 地方公立進学校におけるエリート再生の研究(その2) : エリート創出の試みをとらえる(IV-4部会 進路と教育(4),研究発表IV,一般研究報告)
- 地方公立進学校におけるエリート再生の研究(その1) : 戦後型地域移動とエリート像をとらえなおす(III-3部会 進路と教育(3),研究発表III,一般研究報告)
- 学習者の学習環境の差異に関する研究 : 進学校の生徒に着目して(I-11部会 中・高生の学習,研究発表I,一般研究報告)
- 2.「特色ある専門高校教育」のレリバンス(III-3部会 学校(2),研究発表III,日本教育社会学会第58回大会)