On the "Clinical Truth" in the Terminal Care:A Basis of 'Caring for' and 'Social rules'
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
There have been two ways of discourse, individually or socially, regarding "choices of life and death" in terminally medical practices. The one is 'caring for-discourse' which typically fits to intimate relationships between you and I. The other is 'general normative-discourse' based on principles such as 'self-determination' or 'dignity of humaniy' and so on. In my view, however, what we now need is the third, more fundamental discourse, from which could be commonly produced both 'caring for' and 'social rules'. This way of discourse focuses on "clinical truth" as a social consensus, which consists in non-symmetrically minimal relationships among dying patients, their families and their medical stuffs. Referring to theoretical considerations on the formation of minimal society, I analyze conditions of "clinical truth", and try to pose following points for our discussions : definition of terminal, keeping ease-periods and effective assurance of a certain relative objectivity, as a view of well as care and social consensus.
- 日本哲学会の論文
日本哲学会 | 論文
- 視線の現象学--対人触発の求心的力動について
- 第一回日中学術交流についての報告 (特集 哲学とはいかなる営みか?)
- 「情報化社会」における人間存在--近代的主体と共同体に関わって (特集 現代の精神的状況における自我の問題) -- (共同討議 「情報化社会」における人間存在)
- 相対主義と時間差と無関係 (共同討議2: 相対主義と普遍主義)
- 私自身に対して語る--ヴィトゲンシュタインの「倫理学についての講演」の一解釈