Effects of Appetitive Pretraining of a Relevant Operant Response on the Subsequent Acquisition of a Discriminated Avoidance Response in the Rat
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Rats typically have great difficulty acquiring a discriminated operant bar avoidance. But, the majority of animals learn to bar-press to terminate shock (escape response). The problem of generating efficient bar-press behavior in a relatively convenient period of time and in a satisfactorily high percentage of subjects has been a problem for experimenters working with the Sidman avoidance reinforcement schedule. In a recent review of the literature, it is concluded that the rats fail to master the bar-press conditioned operant response because it is so unlike any of the animal's naturally occurring "species-specific defense reactions (SSDRs)".<BR>The present study asked whether an appetitive pretraining procedure designed to produce high levels of avoidance reponding early in training could have sustained beneficial effects on the performance of a discriminated flapper-push avoidance task. If a flapper-pushing response was positively reinforced and established before the avoidance test, it seems logical that the subsequent avoidance acquisition task would be facilitated.<BR>During an 8-day pretraining period 16 animals (Experimental) were trained to push a flapper for food reward. Eight animals (Control) received the same number of food pellets and were exposed to the same apparatus as the Experimental animals. However, the manipulandum was inoperative during pretraining for Control animals. On completion of the appetitive pretraining period, all animals received the signaled Sidman avoidance conditioning treatment (a daily 1 hr. conditioning session for 6 consecutive days). For example, if the animal permitted 30 sec. to elapse without a flapper-push, a warning stimulus (1250 Hz., 84 db. tone, 5 sec. duration) appeared and remained until terminated by a response. Each response in the absence of tone postponed both tone and a brief shock (shock-shock interval 3 sec., shock duration 0.4 sec., shock intensity 1 ma. a. c.) for 30 sec.<BR>Fig. 1 shows the number of flapper-push responses during the appetitive pretraining period for both Experimental and Control groups. The Experimental group made more responses as compared to the Control group. The present data show that appetitive pretraining to flapper-push for food improves the later acquisition of flapper-push avoidance (Fig. 2 and 4). It is likely that the Experimental group was responding for food during avoidance sessions, although these animals did not receive food reinforcement for response emitted. The significant differences in the number of interstimulus responses (Fig. 3) and total flapperpushing response (Fig. 4) between the Experimental and Control groups indicate that the appetitive pretraining procedure generates a high response rate. Figs. 2 and 5 indicates that the Control group performed quite poorly during the first three avoidance conditioning days. It is conceivable that the repeated shocks during these initial conditioning days firmly establish SSDRs in the Control subjects.<BR>The greater frequency of avoidance responses in the Experimental group was associated with a greater frequency of non-warning flapper responses, indicating that improved avoidance was a direct result of a general increase in flapperpushing. Therefore, increasing the habit strength by pretraining for food, which should not interference with the fear conditioning, seems to be critical.
- 日本動物心理学会の論文
日本動物心理学会 | 論文
- OF-01 チャボ(Gallus gallus domesticus)におけるアモーダル補間知覚の検討 : 視覚探索課題を用いて(日本動物心理学会第68回大会発表要旨)
- 領域間共通モデルの意義についての考察(標的論文(後藤・牛谷,2008)に対する意見,第二部 誌上討論,動物心理学における比較の意義の再検討)
- OD-09 ハトにおけるツェルナー錯視知覚研究2 : 平行か否かの弁別課題を用いて(日本動物心理学会第67回大会発表要旨)
- OD-07 チャボにおけるエビングハウス錯視図形の知覚(日本動物心理学会第67回大会発表要旨)
- OB-02 ハトはツェルナー錯視を知覚するのか?(日本動物心理学会第66回大会発表要旨)