On the Kenmu-shikimoku (_??__??__??__??_)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In 1903, Dr. Y. Hagino declared that the Kenmu-shikimoku was nothing but a political opinion, so he could not recognize it as a promalgated law.<BR>Ever since not only historians but also legal historians have supported his opinion. Recently Mr. Sato, professor of Tokyo University examined the contents of the Kenmu-shikimoku and recognized it as a law of the Muromachi Shogunate.<BR>I examined the contents which were quoted in Shodanchiyo (_??__??__??__??_) by Kanera Ichijo (_??__??__??__??_) and supplemented Mr. Sato's opinion. I compared the contents of the law with the political and social conditions of Nanboku-cho age. I also compared the supplemental laws of the Kamakura Shogunate with those of the Muromachi Shogunate. I have come to the conclusion that the Kenmu-shi-kimoku was the report itself of Zeen Nikaido (_??__??__??__??__??_) and others presented to Shogun Takauji Ashikaga (_??__??__??__??_) at the request of the latter.
- 法制史学会の論文
法制史学会 | 論文
- 角松生史「『古典的収用』における『公共性』の法的構造-一八七四年プロイセン土地収用法における『所有権』と『公共の福祉』-(一)(二)」(東京大学『社会科学研究』四六巻六号、四七巻五号)、同「土地収用手続における『公益』の観念-一八七四年プロイセン土地収用法を素材として-」(同誌四八巻三号)
- 本間敏行「帝政期ローマにおける消防活動と社会的地位―消防隊とウィクス―」
- 藩法研究会編『大名権力の法と裁判』
- 寺田浩明著「「非ルール的な法」というコンセプト―清代中国法を素材として」
- 中世中期・後期ドイツの諸侯法廷