The Irreducibility of Linguistics to Biology:Limitations of Chomsky's Framework
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Chomsky claims that linguistics will become part of biology and that truths about language can be given in terms of facts about the brain. While allowing that psycholinguistic structures may be objects of science, I argue that any account of language must involve more than descriptions of the states of individuals. This implies that many linguistic truths cannot be reduced to neurobiological facts, or even captured on the psychological level within Chomsky's framework. Chomsky's rebuttals to arguments of this sort are examined, but found wanting. This leads to anomalous monism and doubts about whether propositionally construed entities will find analogues in brain science.
- 日本科学哲学会の論文
日本科学哲学会 | 論文
- 時間の推移と記述の固定--マクタガートの「矛盾」に対する第一の書き換え (特集 時間の実在性)
- 書評 永井均著『〈私〉の存在の比類なさ』
- 書評 大庭健著『自分であるとはどんなことか』
- Qualiaの不在
- 書評 河野哲也著『エコロジカルな心の哲学--ギブソンの実在論から』