タイトル無し
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper deals with the problem whether Popper's falsificationism has been refuted by the Duhem-Quine thesis. According to the Duhem-Quine thesis it is not an isolated hypothesis but a theory as a whole that is subjected to an experimental test. And it is claimed that by adding an ad hoc hypothesis or by changing a minor auxiliary hypothesis any falsifications of a theory as a whole can be evaded or at least main hypotheses can be saved from falsifications. Against this I claim that it is not always possible to evade the falsifications. Thus Popper's falsificationism has not been refuted by the Duhem-Quine thesis.
- 日本科学哲学会の論文
日本科学哲学会 | 論文
- 時間の推移と記述の固定--マクタガートの「矛盾」に対する第一の書き換え (特集 時間の実在性)
- 書評 永井均著『〈私〉の存在の比類なさ』
- 書評 大庭健著『自分であるとはどんなことか』
- Qualiaの不在
- 書評 河野哲也著『エコロジカルな心の哲学--ギブソンの実在論から』