The Difference between Activation Energies for the Layer Growth and Interdiffusion in an Intermediate Phase Formed in a Poly-Phase Diffusion Couple
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this study was to account for the origin of the difference between activation energies for the layer growth and interdiffusion in an intermediate phase which was formed in a poly-phase diffusion couple. It was shown that this difference between the two activation energies seems to originate from the temperature dependence of the homogeneity range of the phase. Accordingly, the activation energy of the layer growth (<I>Q</I><SUB><I>K</I><SUP>2</SUP></SUB>) is equal to a sum of the energy of the interdiffusion (<I>Q<SUB>D</SUB></I>) and that attributable to the temperature dependence of the homogeneity range of the phase (<I>Q<SUB>g</SUB></I>).<BR>As a practical example, the energy difference for the β phase in an Al–Cu system was indicated quantitatively. For the β phase, <I>Q</I><SUB><I>K</I><SUP>2</SUP></SUB> is 43.6 kcal/mol, <I>Q<SUB>D</SUB></I> is 27.8 kcal/mol, and <I>Q<SUB>g</SUB></I> is 18.3 kcal/mol. The sum of <I>Q<SUB>D</SUB></I> and <I>Q<SUB>g</SUB></I> is 46.1 kcal/mol, which coincides with <I>Q</I><SUB><I>K</I><SUP>2</SUP></SUB> within the experimental accuracy.<BR>It is also concluded that the activation energy for a layer growth does not coincide with that for an interdiffusion in the phase where the change in the concentration with temperature at that phase boundary is found.
- 社団法人 日本金属学会の論文
社団法人 日本金属学会 | 論文
- Brazing of Inconel 600 and SUS304 Stainless Steel with Used of Rapidly Solidified Nickel-Base Brazing Foil
- Dissolution of Solid Copper into Molten Tin under Static Conditions
- Synthesis of Vapor—Grown Carbon Fibers Using Nanocrystalline Fe91Zr7B2 Alloy as a Catalyst
- MICROGRAVITY LIQUID PHASE SINTERING AND PORE EVOLUTION
- Fine Particle Morphology and Superparamagnetic Property of Overaged Fe–Al–Mn–C Alloys