都市の姿と中心市街地活性化の取り組みに関する研究
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Five years have passed since the Vitalization Act of City Centers was revised in 2006. The number of basic programs certified by the central government has reached 100 and various differences can be found among the cities. However, most have similar target indices such as traffic volume, population size and commerce activity levels. In reality, each city center is surrounded by different environments and required to provide respective services brought by individual vitalization programs for each city center.In this paper, first, we classify cities into seven groups with respect to three features: population size, centrality of the city and interactions with neighboring cities. The city groups are named "atellite cities," "core cities in a district," "sprawled cities," "small cities," "core cities in a region," "compact cities" and "cities."Next, vitalization programs, targets and effectiveness are compared among all city groups. All groups have adopted traffic volume as a target index and except for the "large cities" group have implemented programs in the field of commerce.Most "satellite cities" have many inhabitants that commute to a large city, so they try to develop and implement plans to improve the quality of daily life. "Core cities in a district" attempt to promote commercial activities by increasing traffic and population. "Sprawled cities" do not have distinctive features for their target indices or vitalization programs, because they can't determine effective programs or directions. There are only three cities in the "small cities" group, which don't have budgets to implement large programs. "Core cities in a region" recognize decreased commerce and have many programs to enhance commerce. "Compact cities" set tourism as the index because they want to differentiate themselves from surrounding cities with their unique resources. Nagoya City is the only city in the "large cities" group and strives to fulfill the hub function in the Chubu district.Some vitalization programs are related to city characters. However, it is clear that interurban competition has recently intensified because populations are decreasing . In addition, there are doubts about the effectiveness of setting only population and commerce as the targets. An increase in traffic volume indicates the development of various attractive activities in a city. Various policies such as employment and tourist destination development are related to city center vitalization policies. Also, cities should expand their functions and create original brands while working from the standpoint of urban management.JEL Classification: R54
著者
関連論文
- 都市公共空間の整備におけるリスクマネジメントとその課題 : 広島市の事例分析を中心として
- 発展途上国における観光開発と地域の持続的発展 : ドミニカ共和国における観光振興を事例として
- [特集座談会]新時代の国土計画を考える
- わが国の中山同地域における下水道事業に同する研究 : 広島県太田川上流域における実証分析をふまえて
- 地方自治体における指定管理者制度の導入と地域課題 (菅壽一教授退職記念号)
- 年齢階層別人口の変化に着目した郊外住宅団地の持続可能性の分析 : 広島市の郊外住宅団地を対象として
- 郊外住宅団地の住環境と居住意識に関する研究 : ——広島市内3団地の比較分析——
- 中国地方経済の持続的発展を考える : 中小都市に忍び寄る危機と対応
- 郊外住宅団地の持続可能性と環境要因に関する実証的分析 : —— 広島市の郊外住宅地を対象として ——
- 瀬戸内海の島嶼の発展に向けて (特集 豊かな海と島づくり--里海を守り育てる人と法)
- 瀬戸内海再生のための試論 (特集 瀬戸内海を里海に--新たな視点による再生方策)
- 中心市街地活性化協議会における協働プロセスに関する研究 : 中国地域の4都市を事例として
- 都市の姿と中心市街地活性化の取り組みに関する研究