Spatial Application of the Name-giving Prohibition of the Orochon in the Southeastern Part of Greater Khingan Range, Northern China, in the 1930s : Foreword to the Comparative Study of Culture between the Orochon and the Ainu
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
It is known that the the name-giving prohibition of the Ainu was applied, not only among individual settlement dwellers, but among the inhabitants of each district during the early 1800s and 1850s. The name-giving prohibition among the Ainu dictated that the name of a living neighbor or a dead person should not be given to another individual. However, such culture as name-giving prohibition among the Ainu has not been investigated among other societies.The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial range of the application of the name-giving prohibition among the Orochon in the southeastern part of Greater Khingan Range, northern China, in the 1930s. The findings of the analysis are as follows:The core members of the household consisted of the household head, his or her spouse, and his or her son and/or daughter in many cases. The number of persons who lived in the same household were within the range of 2 to 11 persons (mean 5.1 persons per household). The number of settlement dwellers was within the range of 4 to 40 persons (mean 14.6 persons per settlement) in summer, but was 4 to 66 persons (mean 19.4 persons per settlement) in winter. The number of households within the same settlements was within the range of 1 to 9 households (mean 2.8 households per settlement) in summer, but was within the range of 1 to 11 households (mean 3.8 households per settlement) in winter. The settlement size of the Orochon was smaller than that of the Ainu in the early 1800s.No one had the same name as that of a living member within the same household. This was true in spite of their having at least two clan names (family names) in the same household. The Orochon individual has clan name and given name, but the Ainu has given name only. The ratio of persons who contravened the prohibition against taking the name of a living neighbor within the same settlement (the number of persons whose names were same as those of living persons in the same settlement/total number of inhabitants) was 0% in summer, but was 0.6% in winter. That ratio of the Ainu in the early 1800s was within the range of 0.3% to 1.6% by district. When the study area is expanded from settlement to district, the ratio of persons who contravened the name-giving prohibition was 1.1%. That ratio of the Ainu in the early 1800s was within the range of 0.3% to 1.6% by district in the early 1800s, and was within the range of 0% to 4.4% by district in the 1850s. The namegiving prohibition of the Orochon was widely applied, not only among individual household members and settlement dwellers, but also among the inhabitants of the southeastern part of Greater Khingan range.
著者
関連論文
- 狩猟採集民オロチョン社会における定住と農耕開始の萌芽 : 中国の大連図書館・魯迅路分館所蔵の資料を用いて
- アイヌの定住期間からみた集団の空間的流動性 : 1856-1869年の東蝦夷地三石場所を例に
- 大興安嶺におけるオロチョンの集落構成の流動性
- 鄂倫春"集落"(烏力楞)構成規模考 : 従民俗地理学的視角展開
- 狩猟採集民オロチョンの集落の戸数規模
- 狩猟採集民オロチョンの集落研究に向けて
- 1930年代の大興安嶺南東部におけるオロチョンの命名規則 : アイヌとオロチョンの文化に関する比較研究にむけて
- 集団の空間的流動性からみたアイヌ集落の持続的な血縁関係 : 1856-1869(安政3-明治2)年の東蝦夷地三石場所を例に
- 1800年代初期のアイヌの社会構造と命名規則の空間的適用範囲
- 19世紀のアイヌ社会における和名化の展開過程
- アイヌ集落の空間的流動性と空間占拠の平等性 : 東蝦夷地三石場所を例に
- 狩猟採集社会における集団の空間的流動性の測定に関する一試論 : アイヌとオロチョンの比較
- アイヌの流動的集団の形成過程と血縁関係
- 1800年代初期の択捉島のアイヌ社会における和名化の展開過程
- 1800年代初期のアイヌ社会における命名規則の空間的適用範囲
- アイヌ文化と高校地理教育
- 東蝦夷地静内場所におけるアイヌの命名規則の空間的適用範囲
- カラフトアイヌにおける家構成員の流動性の可能性
- 高校地理教育における狩猟採集民アイヌ
- 19世紀中期の東蝦夷地三石場所におけるアイヌ集落の存続期間と血縁親族関係
- Spatial Application of the Name-giving Prohibition of the Orochon in the Southeastern Part of Greater Khingan Range, Northern China, in the 1930s : Foreword to the Comparative Study of Culture between the Orochon and the Ainu
- 三石アイヌの集落と集落群,1856〜69年--流動的集団の形成