フィッション・トラック法および黒曜石水和層法による立川ロームの編年〔英文〕 (総合研究「テフロクロノロジーの基礎的研究」(特集))
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Measurements of hydration-rim thickness for about 1, 500 obsidian samples, collected from 30 Preceramic occupation layers, mainly from the Musashino and Sagamino uplands, are correlated with four key fission track dates obtained from burnt obsidian specimens collected from hearths at four different sites.These key dates are:4, 700±300 years B. P. for Middle Jomon (Klasori), 7, 400±500 years B. P. for the boundary of Early and Earliest Jomon (Kayama), 11, 100±700 years B. P. for Yasumiba (microblade industry), and15, 200±1, 000 years B. P. for ICU Loc. 15 (backed-blade industry).By correlation with these four key dates, tentative hydration rates for obsidians found in South Kanto were obtained.group rate (micron2/thousand years) forK1 0.28 YS dacite obsidianK2 0.98 D2 and D5 dacite obsidianK3 2.69 Asama dacite obsidianK4 5.13 Wadatoge and Kirigamine rhyolite obsidianK5 7.89 Assumed to be Hoshikuso rhyolite obsidianWorking hypotheses for chronometric dating by obsidian hydration rates assumed that the linear correlation of the lapse of time after fracturing of the obsidian and the square of the measured hydration thickness was valid and that the contemporaneity of the time of deposition of the tephra layer and the time of the Preceramic human activity was positive. On these assumptions, a chronology of the Tachikawa Loam was derived as follows:soft loam III 9, 000-12, 500 years B. P., hard loam IV 12, 500-18, 500, black band I V 18, 500-21, 000, black band II IX around 25, 000.Based on these dates, MACHIDA's (1971) hypothesis of the constancy of the deposition rate of the tephra is roughly supported. In this connection, the fission track date for the Tokyo Pumice(TP), 49, 000±5, 000 years B. P., reported elsewhere (MACHIDA and SUZUKI, 1971), was checkedby obsidian hydration dating using the hydration rate K1; the calculated date of 46, 000 B. P, is consistent with the fission track date within the error limits of each method.The many discrepancies between the fission track-obsidian hydration dates and radiocarbon dates are not explained at present because of the scarcity of comparable data for both fission track and radiocarbon dates from the Preceramic cultural layers in South Kanto.a
著者
関連論文
- 討論記事
- フィッション・トラック法による黒曜石の年代測定 : とくに,新潟油田地帯から採取された試料に観察される自発核分裂飛跡の部分的消失について
- 11 討論にかえて
- 36. 黒曜石による若い火山岩の K-Ar 法とフィッション・トラック法年代の相互検討(日本火山学会 1970 年春季大会講演要旨)
- フィッション・トラック法および黒曜石水和層法による立川ロームの編年〔英文〕 (総合研究「テフロクロノロジーの基礎的研究」(特集))