The assessment of preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The comparison between "whole-liver" TAE and "lobar or segmental" TAE.:The comparison between "whole-liver" TAE and "lobar or segmental" TAE

概要

論文の詳細を見る
In 180 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent radical hepatectomy, 52 patients were received preoperative arterial chemoembolization (TAE) for the whole liver (whole-liver TAE group: group A), 39 for the limited area of the liver (lobar or segmental TAE group: group B) and the remaining 89 had no treatments before surgery (control group: group C). In order to evaluate the significance of preoperative TAE, long-term prognoses were compared among the three groups. Although there were no significant differences in survivals between A and C, the 2- and 6-year survivals in group B were significantly better than those in group C (P<0.05). With regard to reduction rates of tumors and necrotizing effect for daughter nodules after TAE, the lobar or segmental TAE was significantly superior to the whole-liver TAE. Moreover, the lobar or segmental TAE deteriorated the liver function significantly less than the whole-liver TAE. These findings suggest that the lobar or segmental TAE is more advantageous than the whole-liver TAE as a preoperative adjuvant therapy.
財団法人日本消化器病学会の論文