けい光X線法によるフェロアロイの日常分析

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• Ferroalloys such as Fe-Mn, Si-Mn, Fe-Cr, Si-Cr and Ca-Si were daily analysed by means of fluorescence X-ray. Ferromanganese and ferrochromium slags were also examined. After sampling they were crushed into fine powder and pressed to each briquettes without binder. A full automatic analyser, Rigaku's IKF-III, was adopted.<BR>A motor-generator and a stabilizer were equipped to minimize supplied power fluctuation. It was seemed that they covered completely actual fluctuation of supplied powder. In the X-ray analyser, a LiF crystal was used for analysis of Fe, Mn, Cr and Ca, when a scintillation counter measured their X-ray intensity to compare with that of each standard samples. An EDDT crystal with a proportional counter was used to analyse Si and Al. An ADP crystal with the proportional counter was used for Mg. In all analysis K<SUB>α</SUB> spectrum of each elements was selected. Analysis of Fe, Mn, and Cr in Fe-Mn, Si-Mn, Fe-Cr and Si-Cr were done under atmosphere, but in vacuo in other cases. To separate SiK<SUB>α</SUB> from FeK<SUB>β</SUB>, an optimum base line and channel width were selected in a pulse height analyser conditions. Analysis of Si under 4% was done with a fixed time (80 sec.) method while a fixed count method was used in ether cases. All operating conditions were shown. Products of ferroalloys were usually specified according to their chemical composition, then calibration curves were classified in details within ranges of about 5% in the case of major elements and about 3% for minor Si. In the case of slags they were in the ranges of about 15%. Precision of calibration curves were statistically tested by t-distribution of 20 differences between X-ray values and wet chemical values for ferroalloys and 10 differences for slags. Standard deviation of repeatness of X-ray method in routine work during several years were shown in comparison with that of wet chemical method. In case of Si lower than 4% they were 0, 040.11%, being greater than that of wet chemical method. In other cases standard deviation of X-ray method were less than that of wet chemical method. Coefficients of variance in X-ray method were about 1% which seemed to be good results. No matrix effect was observed in this work.

著者

• 奥田 欽之助

  日本重化学工業(株)

• 奥田 欽之助

  日本重化学工業株式会社

関連論文

• 18 O_2 及び CO_2 雰囲気下における Cr 半還元ペレットの再酸化(製銑基礎・還元鉄, 製銑・環境管理, 日本鉄鋼協会第 93 回(春季)講演大会)
• 半還元クロムペレット中の金属クロム及び金属鉄の定量法
• 308 半還元クロムペレット中の金属クロム及び金属鉄の定量法(廃酸処理・情報処理・分析, 性質, 日本鉄鋼協会第 90 回(秋季)講演大会)
• 40 Mn_7C_3 溶湯における SiO_2 の還元反応について(焼結・ペレット・フェロアロイ, 製銑, 日本鉄鋼協会第 80 回(秋季)講演大会講演)
• 39 FeO および MnO による SiC の分解反応(焼結・ペレット・フェロアロイ, 製銑, 日本鉄鋼協会第 80 回(秋季)講演大会講演)
• 38 Fe および Mn による SiC の分解反応(焼結・ペレット・フェロアロイ, 製銑, 日本鉄鋼協会第 80 回(秋季)講演大会講演)
• けい光X線法によるフェロアロイの日常分析
• けい光X線分析のためのフェロアロイ試料の成形方法

スポンサーリンク