Multi Agent/Object Simulation in Human Swimming
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In human swimming, there are many situations in which the target of the analysis is not only the swimmer but also other swimmers or other equipment, such as synchronized swimming by multiple swimmers, swimming with fins, and so on. The objective of this study was to extend the swimming human simulation model SWUM so that it could handle the dynamic behavior of multiple rigid bodies and could freely describe the mechanical interactions among the rigid bodies. In this paper, the outline of SWUM is described first. The extension to the multi agent/object simulation and its implementation are explained next. Finally, its validity and usefulness are examined by discussing three examples of analysis. The first example was synchronized swimming by three swimmers. From the simulation results, it was found that the three swimmers gradually gathered, and finally the swimmers upper limbs stably formed a hexagon. The second example was monofin swimming. The monofin was divided into five rigid plates in this simulation in order to represent its elastic deformation. From the simulation results, it was found that the swimmer accelerated at the moments of downward and upward kicks. The third example was the shooting motion in water polo. From the simulation results, it was found that the ball was smoothly released and flew in an appropriate direction. Since reasonable results were obtained in these examples of analysis, the validity and usefulness of the extension were confirmed.
論文 | ランダム
- 6-3A03 SrTiO_3 セラミックスの粒界特性 (3)
- 民事関係 平成20.4.15小判 弁護士会の設置する人権擁護委員会が受刑者から人権救済の申立てを受け,同委員会所属の弁護士が調査の一環として他の受刑者との接見を申し入れた場合において,これを許さなかった刑務所長の措置に国家賠償法1条1項にいう違法がないとされた事例 (最高裁判所判例解説--平成20年1,2,3,4,6,7月分)
- 民事関係 平成20.3.13小決 1.民事再生法174条2項3号所定の「再生計画の決議が不正の方法によって成立するに至ったとき」には,再生計画案が信義則に反する行為に基づいて可決された場合が含まれるか 2.民事再生法172条の3第1項1号の趣旨を潜脱し信義則に反する再生債務者らの行為に基づいて再生計画案が可決されたとして,再生計画に同法174条2項3号所定の不認可事由があるとされた事例 (最高裁判所判例解説--平成20年1,2,3,4,6,7月分)
- 民事関係 平成20.2.15小判 証券取引法(平成16年法律第97号による改正前のもの)17条に定める損害賠償責任の責任主体は同法にいう発行者等に限られるか (最高裁判所判例解説--平成20年1,2,3,4,6,7月分)
- 民事関係 平成20.1.24小判 受遺者から民法1041条1項の規定による価額弁償の意思表示を受けた遺留分権利者が受遺者に対し価額弁償を請求する旨の意思表示をした場合において,当該遺留分権利者が遺贈の目的物について価額弁償請求権を確定的に取得する時期 (最高裁判所判例解説--平成20年1,2,3,4,6,7月分)