非意図的な出来事と「損失構文」 : 使役構文との相違について
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper examines the three suggested hypotheses—the responsibility theory, the possession theory and the loss theory—that have been previously provided in order to explain the verbal codification of non-intentional events, such as "I broke my leg," as transitive clauses. To support the loss theory we characterize non-intentional transitive clauses as "Loss Constructions" and clearly demonstrate these loss constructions, which share the same predicate as intentional transitive clauses (i.e. causative constructions, e.g. "I broke a dead branch"), are completely different based on the event structure and the semantic structure, as well as its motivation.
- 大阪大学大学院文学研究科の論文
- 2013-03-31
大阪大学大学院文学研究科 | 論文
- アジア太平洋地域における旧日本軍の空中写真による地図作製
- 島原大変における眉山崩壊時の水蒸気爆発に関連すると推定される資料について
- カラホト出土蒙漢合璧税糧納入簿断簡
- 中期ハイデガ-の真理論--真理の本質を目指す問いと転回
- 「蔵俊僧都作」『類集抄』について