インドにおける2004-05年度発足の国民会議派主導第1次UPA連合政権および2009-10年度発足の同第2次連合政権下における公企業の株式売却・民営化政策とその実態
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The wide-ranging economic liberalisation in India made progress inorder to meet conditionality imposed by the IMF that was requirededfor the loan to overcome the unprecedented foreign debt crisis sinceJanuary 1991．Since the Industrial Policy Statement of July 1991，thepublic sector enterprises has been reformed in many ways. Disinvestmentand privatisation in public enterprises that I study in this article istaken as a part of it.The Congress government inaugurating in June 1991 adopted the policyof sale of minority shareholding in the Central Public Sector Enterprises（CPSEs)，and a number of governments since then also continuedto take the same policy. After that, the BJP（Bharatiya JanataParty：Hindu nationalist party)-led National Democratic Alliance（NDA）government was formed in March 1998．The situation tookon a new aspect. Under that government, the policy of minority shareholdingsale in CPSEs changed into one of“strategic sale”without realdiscussion. The latter means transferring not only of substantial shareholdingbut also control of management in CPSEs. This represents theprivatisation of CPSEs.Such has been discussed in my other articles.After the BJP-led NDA Goverment, the 1st Congress-led UPA government inaugurated in May 2004 with left parties support outsidecabinet. This government complicated the policy of disinvestment andprivatisation in CPSEs. Receipts through sale of shareholding in CPSEswas also poor. Meanwhile, the revival and breakdown of the“strategicsale”drama seemed to be played. And then the left parties withdrewsupport outside cabinet over the atomic power agreement between Indiaand the USA.Congress changed the administrative framework, and kept the alliedgovernment. In the following year, Congress won the general electionwith the new alliance. The 2nd Congress-led UPA government inauguratedwith left parties disappearing. Therefore, the 2nd Congress-ledUPA government got the expanded degree of freedom in selecting policies.In two years 2009-10/2010-11，the policy of disinvestment andprivatisation in CPSEs changed radically. Receipts through sale ofshareholding in CPSEs increased drastically. The government proposedto encourage“People's Ownership of PSUs（Public Sector Undertakings)”based on the programme to broadbase the ownership of CPSUs.The Minister of Finance advertised to attract around 5 million retail investorsin the year 2010-11．This article inquire into above matters. I raise many questions. Whatis the actual situation of“5 million retail investers”? What will be thefuture policy of disinvstment and privatisation by the 2nd Congress-ledUPA government that got the expanded degree of freedom in selectingpolicies ? ……
- 2011-09-26
論文 | ランダム
- I-B-16 カドミウム曝露における胎盤の細胞死の誘導と核内転写因子のCREBの発現(生殖器2,一般演題 口演,第45回日本組織細胞化学会総会・学術集会)
- Southwestern Histochemistryの理論と実際的応用(IV.注目すべき新しいテクニック)
- 脈絡膜転移腫瘍の放射線治療
- 30-III-01 炎症胎盤モデルにおけるミトコンドリアのストレス応答とアポトーシス(アポトーシス,一般口演,第44回日本組織細胞化学会 第35回日本臨床電子顕微鏡学会 合同学術集会)
- 技術講座 In situ hybridizationによるゲノム転写物の局在証明と定量的解析