補完関係式を用いた実蒸発散量推定式の改良
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Advection-Aridity(AA) model can calculate actual evapotranspiration by using only meteorological data. However, comparing the model with Penman equation showed that AA model doesn’t properly evaluate evapotranspiration from urban moisture area. In urban area, Actual evaporation from water calculated by AA model(E) are much less than that by Penman equation(Epo). Multiple regression analysis using estimation results indicates that the difference between the models is due to the difference of the sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit between the models. To improve this problem, modification coefficient k, defined as k=a・albedo+b, is suggested. Regression coefficients a, b are determined as satisfying k=Epo/E for water and k=1 for urban surface. By using this coefficient k, evaporation from water is nearly equal to value estimated by Penman equation, while evaporation from urban surface is changeless.
- 2011-03-18
論文 | ランダム
- 22aPS-24 (Sr,La)B_6、(Ba,La)B_6の磁化と電気抵抗
- 臨床検査値をどう読むか?--迅速・的確な診断のための臨床検査をめざして(3)脂質異常症の治療中にクレアチンキナーゼ高値がみられ、中止後も改善しない73歳女性
- 10 Hypovolemic shockを契機に診断された,悪性褐色細胞腫の1例(第46回下越内科集談会)
- 各疾患における浮腫の機序とアプローチ 薬剤誘発性浮腫 (特集 浮腫を診る)
- 播種性淋菌感染症の1例