スティグマの克服と改称はいかにして可能か？ : 対話の意義と必要性の検討
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this article I tried to discuss how can we overcome and dissolve stigmata in communities as a historical issue. At first I studied problems with enlightenment and socio-education programs for anti-stigmata, I found a problem that programs have a mechanism for participants to think as if it were somebody's own affair. In addition I found a limitation by which citizenship developmental model assume ‘interested citizens’, but actually there are stigmata and various prejudices against minority groups (ex. homeless, foreigners) in communities. So we must try to develop and build a‘conflict model’as a new community work model in Japan. In conclusion adapting P. Freire's concept‘problem-posing education’and K. Lewin's workshop style, I proposed to create workshops for dialogue among citizens about stigmata in communities. Concretely, I analyzed participant' viewpoints, dialogue style and conditions in workshops. Participant's viewpoints are following four types in workshops. The first is citizenship. The second is the person concerned. The third is professionalism. The fourth is non-professionalism. Their viewpoints are equally valid, and they are very important to found grass-roots democracy. Lastly effective dialogues facilitate two reflections in participants. The first is internal reflection about stigmata in their daily living. And the second is external reflection toward stigmatized people as individual human beings. So in the workshop it is very important for the facilitator as an enabler to facilitate effective dialogues.
- 2010-01-00
論文 | ランダム
- ケンゾ-監督のこと (「夢・夢のあと」)
- 選後評 (第30回新人映画シナリオコンク-ル最終審査発表)
- 映画と犯罪についての漫文 (「薔薇の標的」)
- シナリオ作家対談--書くこと・生きること・想うこと-7-悪の愉しみ
- 選後評 (第18回新人テレビシナリオコンク-ル最終審査発表)