1993年広島・長崎「平和宣言」の一考察 : 広島大学学生311名の意識調査結果をとおして
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this paper is to verify differences of the 'Peace Declarations' delivered in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1993. Needless to say, both these 'Declarations' appealed the total abolition of nuclear weapons and complete disarmament in the earth. But, in practice, there were so many differences of content between them. The authors sent out questionnaires for 311 members of Hiroshima university students. The question is 'As to the 'Peace Declarations' made in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1993. Which 'Declaration' do you feel sympathy for Hiroshima's or Nagasaki's ? And give your reasons for choosing it'. As a result, Nagasaki 'Peace Declaration' proved to have far higher opinions of the subjects than Hiroshima. The main reasons are as follows: (1) It was easier to understand 'Peace Declaration' of Nagasaki than of Hiroshima. (2) Hitoshi Motoshirna, the Mayor of Nagasaki,admitted that Japan had aggressed the Asian countries from 1910 to 1945, showed more friendly attitude to these countries than Takashi Hiraoka, the Mayor of Hiroshima. Nagasaki 'Peace Declarations' have had higher opinions than Hiroshima since the authors began this investigation on 1990. However, the 'Declaration' of Nagasaki in 1993 have more faults than the past 3 years beyond doubt. Because the support rate against it have come down than before. The faults are as follows: (1) The Nagasaki 'Declaration' never mentioned 'PKO' (Peace Keeping Operation) which Japan come up against now. (2) The Nagasaki 'Declaration' didn't definite the concreate compensation and assistance to non-Japanese victims of Atomic Bomb.
論文 | ランダム
- 英国における公共住宅のコストコントロ-ル法に関する研究--コストヤ-ドステック制度について(要約)
- 講演 中央労働委員会労働者委員研修会(二〇一一年七月一〇日)から 労使紛争処理機関としての労働委員会の課題--最近の統計からあらためて考える
- 自社店舗をあらためて見直すときだ! 標準化の原型「プロトタイプ」を創造せよ (チェーン化の「壁」を乗り越えろ!)
- 大日本農会創立130年記念中央農事講演会 あらためて農業・農政のあり方を考える--経済連携問題をめぐって[含 質疑応答]
- 今、あらためて百姓成立と民間社会を読む (東京歴史科学研究会歴史科学講座「書評会・『深谷克己近世史論集』をどう読むか」)