東アジアの華厳思想における無碍説
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The concept of Non-obstruction (Skt. apratigha) between separate phenomena is often used to characterize the essence of Huayan One Vehicle thought. Generally, the concept of non-obstruction of separate phenomena implies that individual things resonate with each other, and that this is due to the fact that they are each based on a universal principle which unifies diversity. Zhi-yan expressed the experiential realm of the Huayan One Vehicle with the simile of Indra's Net. According to him, such a view of existence is not seen in the realm of the Three Vehicles, but only in the realm of Samantabhadra-bodhisattva. Succeeding Zhi-yan, Ui-sang revealed the Huayan experiential realm through the function of the principle of dharani. Such a world of the Huayan symbolized in dharani reveals a chaotic place, where not only mutual identity but also non-mutual identity is possible. Fa-zang emphasized the six types of dependent co-arising causality as the basis for understanding the non-obstruction theory. This means that all the experiential realms, which arise due to mutual relationships with each other, are formed by relations between causes and conditions. Weon-hyo often expressed the world of dependent origination by citing the relationship between the large and the small. That is, the large and the small are the same because of their lacking of substance. Hui-yuan held non-self-nature as the main theory for the basis of the view of non-obstruction, casting aside Fa-zang's explanation, which was based on the power of dependent co-arising as mutual causation. Furthermore, although Cheng-guan strongly criticized Hui-yuan's opinion, he also considered the principle of dharma-nature to be the basis for non-obstruction. Therefore, we can see the extent of Hui-yuan's influence on non-obstruction theory after Fa-zang. The influence of Weon-hyo and Fa-zang on Huayan studies of the Nara period in Japan is tremendous. In the Gokyousho-shiji, Jurei developed his dependent origination theory based on the approaches of Weon-hyo and Fa-zang. The specific feature of the Japanese Huayan School is seen in the Kegon-gokyo jushu-daii-ryakusho, which was written some time after 851. In this text, non-obstruction is expressed by the three kinds of perfect infusion theories -- the perfect infusion of phenomena and principle, separate phenomena, principle and principle are introduced as the perfect infusion of One Vehicle. Previous studies on non-obstruction theory in the Kegon School have not sufficiently examined this point, so it should be taken into account henceforth.
- 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室,Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo,東京大学大学院の論文
- 2005-03-31
著者
関連論文
- 薬師寺長期の華厳思想について
- 平安時代の私記『華嚴宗立教義』の研究
- 『華厳宗種性義抄』における法相意批判
- 東大寺写本、理理円融について
- 平安時代の華厳私記類における成仏論
- 『華厳十玄義私記』について
- 日本華厳における三乗廻心説
- 韓国華厳における三乗極果廻心説の流れ
- 『華厳経文義要決問答』の基礎的研究(朝鮮半島に流入した諸文化要素の研究)
- 義相系の華厳学における一乗義の特質
- 新羅下代における華厳と禅の宗派意識
- 東アジアの華厳思想における無碍説
- 平安時代における東大寺・薬師寺の華厳学の相違--東大寺所蔵の未紹介写本『五教章中巻種子義私記』を通じて (公慶上人三百年御遠忌記念号)
- 均如の法華経観 (龍谷大学における第50回学術大会紀要(1))
- 増春『華厳一乗義私記』における一乗の意味
- 均如の頓円一乗義の成立と意図について
- 『華厳十玄義私記』の基礎的研究
- 金沢文庫所蔵、円弘の『妙法蓮華経論子注』について
- 法上撰『十地論義疏』についての一考察