Chronic and Transient Poverty in Indonesia: A Spatial Perspective with the 2008-2010 Susenas Panel Data
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This study analyzes poverty dynamics by region for urban and rural areas based on the 2008-2010 panel Susenas. It also conducts a probit analysis to explore the determinants of poverty based on the 2008 consumption module Susenas. We found that while 11% of rural people and 7% of urban people are chronically poor, there are a large number of transiently poor people in Indonesia. These transiently poor people have a high risk of falling into poverty occasionally. There is also a large difference in the extent of chronic and transient poverty among regions. While the government should implement policies to alleviate chronic poverty, it should at the same time introduce policies that could keep transiently poor people above the poverty line. Since there is a large regional variation in the extent of poverty, spatially differentiated poverty alleviation programs should be introduced according to the extent and nature of poverty.
- 2013-09-00
著者
-
Akita Takahiro
International Development Program Graduate School Of International Relations International Universit
-
Dariwardani Ni
Alumnus 2012, International University of Japan
関連論文
- Inter-sectoral Interdependence and Growth in Vietnam : A Comparative Analysis with Indonesia and Malaysia
- Urban and Rural Dimensions of Income Inequality in Vietnam
- Spatial Dimensions of Expenditure Inequality and the Role of Education in Indonesia : An Analysis of the 2008-2010 Susenas Panel
- Educational Expansion and Inequality in Indonesia: Testing the Kuznets Hypothesis with Provincial Panel Data
- Structural Changes and Interregional Income Inequality in the Philippines, 1975-2009
- Chronic and Transient Poverty in Indonesia: A Spatial Perspective with the 2008-2010 Susenas Panel Data
- The Roles of Location and Education in the Distribution of Economic Well-being in Indonesia: Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Inequality Decomposition Analyses
- Urbanization and Expenditure Inequality in Indonesia: Testing the Kuznets Hypothesis with Provincial Panel Data