住民参加型講座企画方式における社会教育職員の「差異」と「距離」の確保戦略に関する研究(III 研究報告)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Recently, the need for residents' participation has been discussed enthusiastically in academic discourse and the mass media. This means that a change in the form of democracy has occurred, with creating a "partnership society" intended by this change. This "partnership society" has as its base the ideal that administration transfers its rights to residents and that residents are equal to administration. This ideal includes certain unclear elements, however. As the ideal is carried out, great obstructions will occur. To overcome these, we need to examine the problems that we will confront in carrying out the ideal. Therefore, this paper examines local governments in which attempts to create a new form of democracy based on a partnership between administration and residents has been made. The author also pays attention to officers in the local government who are connected with carrying out the ideal. The author analyzes their thinking and attitude toward residents' participation and considers problems that will occur during the process of this ideal being carried out. This is why the author observed the method of planning programs based on residents' participation at B public hall in A city. In addition, the author interviewed three officers there. The results of the research are as follows: The officers didn't equate themselves with residents, but had the following thoughts and attitudes. (1) They thought that they needed to preserve a qualitative "difference" between residents and themselves. (2) They thought that they needed to preserve a definite "detachment" between the residents and themselves. (3) They took a cynical approach and attitude toward residents' participation after experiencing many difficulties to preserve "difference" and "detachment". They gave up even their original belief that they should adopt residents' opinions and thought that it was only natural that only administration's opinions should be adopted. We note the following from these results: If we leave these conditions as it is, the partnership between administration and residents will fall off. Therefore, the author presents the following three problems that need to be addressed in order to overcome these conditions. Administration and residents should overcome these problems together. (1)It is necessary to establish the guidelines and divide roles between the administration and residents. (2) It is necessary to provide training for staffs and residents who participate and adjust for differences of opinion. (3) It is necessary to improve the techniques for evaluating policies objectively. By using these techniques, we need to calculate whether the systems of residents' participation will be able to maintain "impartiality" and "neutrality" and how high they can achieve policy objectives.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 2005-10-14
著者
関連論文
- 岩木秀夫著『ゆとり教育から個性浪費社会へ』(ちくま書房,2004年1月)
- NPM (New Public Management) 時代における社会教育事業の成果測定に関する一考察
- 「参加」のアカウンタビリティ : 図式以降の社会教育学パラダイムの構築に向けて
- 社会教育・生涯学習の社会学的研究の可能性 : 学習内容研究の系譜をたどって
- 「受益者負担」導入に伴う教育の「公共性」の定義づけをめぐるポリティクス : 行政・市民協働型生涯学習施設でのフィールドワークから(I-6部会 生涯教育,研究発表I,一般研究報告)
- 「参加」のポリティクス : 図式以降の社会教育学パラダイムの構築に向けて(学習運動)
- 成人教育における「自発的・主体的な学習活動」の編成過程に関する社会学的研究
- 「自発的・主体的な学習活動」の「社会教育文化」による選抜メカニズムに関する研究(地域と教育(3))
- 住民参加型講座企画方式における社会教育職員の「差異」と「距離」の確保戦略に関する研究(III 研究報告)