工学としてのデザイン(1) : 工学的研究の可能性

概要

論文の詳細を見る
To study, commonly, means to study scientifically. Of course, to study on design. And many discussions and declarations on the meaning of science. The most general of them tells us to cognize phenomena and describe them in orderly. However, to study on design, if it belongs to science, hasn't distincted phenomena of design, although there are many researches and declarations. If we want it is science to study on design, phenomena of design are "designed matters", provided by the definition of itself. Neverthless, most of studies on design aren't to cognize "designed matters", phenomena of design. Rather than cognition, they are studies "to design" or "how to design". "To design" is one of the behaviour of men. And, to cognize the behaviour of men is psychology or sociology. However, it is possible to study as they are methods, not to be objects of cognition. It means the arrangement of ideas and the making of plans in order to get something done, or system. To study, to discuss and to judge the method of men in behaviour, of design and of any others. It is general need for sciences to study the method in their fields to get semething done. This fact pointed out by the popular use of a word "engineering". For instances, "social engineering", "human engineering" and etc. Society and human, both of them aren't traditional objects of engineerings. The reason of popular uses of a word "engineering" is following. There is a foundamental thihking in engineerings. It has common with each engineerings, called "design (in engineering)". To set up some objects and to realize them, these are remarkable points of "design". These points have something common with "to design (a form)", too. Therefore, isn't it possible to study on design as an engineering, to find an order in our studies on design?
日本デザイン学会の論文
1972-03-30

工学としてのデザイン(1) : 工学的研究の可能性

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク