餘戸について(慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集)

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• The word "Amaribe" means the surplus number of families. It was; fixed after the Taika Restoration (645) that fifty families should form a Sato under the newly established village system. As it was only a formal method of allocation, there remained some number of families which were not included in the Sato 里. These families were called "Amaribe" or surplus families. There is no question about the. Amaribe system itself. The question is how and under what circumstances it was established. In this respect, there have been various opinions among our historians. However, no authentic study of actual conditions of the system has been introduced until now. This was because reliable material was scarce and because the Ryo (Code) 令, which was the basic law of the period in question lacked the provisions con- cerning the Amaribe. Many of our historians accepted the description of the "Ryo-no-Gige" or the Interpretation of the Code, promulgated in 834, that in the case of a large village consisting of more than 60 families, more than 10 families out of the whole number of the families in the village formed an Amaribe. However, the writer of this article could hardly support such as opinion in theory and in practice. The writer, after inquiring into the number of the Amaribe and the places where the Amaribe were established, found the fact that even in a Kori 郡 (a county under the administrative section of those days) there was only one Amaribe and that where Amaribe were established were the county limits, seaside districts and remote places in the mountains. From the aforesaid facts, the writer has attempted to prove that when the families were allocated according to the system under which it was fixed that 50 families in a Kori should form a Sato, the odd number formed an Amaribe. Furthermore, the writer has attempted to comment on the actual condition of the Amaribe to prove that it was by no means a medley of families and that in some cases an Amaribe included some organized villages.

• 慶應義塾大学の論文

著者

• 村山 光一

  慶應義塾大学文学部

関連論文

• 甲子の宣の「民部・家部」と天武四年詔の「部曲」について(IV)
• 甲子の宣の「民部・家部」と天武四年詔の「部曲」について(III)
• 甲子の宣の「民部・家部」と天武四年詔の「部曲」について(II)
• 甲子の宣の「民部・家部」と天武4年詔の「部曲」について-3-
• 甲子の宣の「民部・家部」と天武四年詔の「部曲」について(I)
• 代の制と班田収授制
• 大化改新前夜における息長氏の政治的役割
• 菊池康明著, 日本古代土地所有の研究, 昭和四十四年三月, 東京大学出版会刊(批評と紹介)
• 伊福部について(今宮新先生古稀記念)
• 墾田関係文書の村(松本芳夫先生古稀記念)
• 郷里制と村
• 餘戸について(慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集)
• 郷里制について

もっと見る 閉じる

スポンサーリンク