契約主義的リベラリズムの粗描
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
投稿論文1. 契約主義とは何か (1) 契約主義とは何か (2) 契約主義の根拠 (3) 合理性と平等性の関連 (4) 平等性についての誤解2. 合意にいたるための二つのレベル (1) 第一のレベルと第二のレベル (2) 合意にしたがうべき理由3. 契約主義に対するいくつかの批判 (1) 全員一致原則への批判 (2) 実現可能性をめぐる批判 : その1 (3) 実現可能性をめぐる批判 : その2 (4) 事実と価値に関する疑問4. 価値観の対立からリベラリズムを導きだすことができるか (1) 価値観の対立と平等な自由は両立しうるか (2) 世界および人間は人びとの自由に耐えうるのか5. 弱いリベラリズムの導出 (1) 多数決原則の採用 (2) 主観的な理想や好み等は除外されるべきこと (3) 各人は原則として平等に扱われるべきこと (4) いくつかの自由権の保障6. 強いリベラリズムのための条件 (1) 弱いリベラリズムについての補足 (2) 経験主義の受容 (3) 感覚経験を通して見える世界7. 強いリベラリズムの導出 (1) 人間と世界の関係を示すものとしての欲求 (2) 人びとが欲するもの (3) 平等な権利の導出This paper consists of two parts. In the first half the thesis of contractualism and its justification are presented. Contractualism requires that norms of conduct be based on the agreement of every member of a society. This requirement has two bases. First, ways of life and social systems must be rational; that is, be assessed and founded on the most thorough understanding possible of human nature and the world. Second, since all human beings are similar, they have similar abilities to understand, and therefore they are equally competent to participate in the judgement of ways of life and social systems. Because of this equality, judgments they can agree to unanimously are probably the most suitable ones that they can reach. If we consider these two bases to be valid, we must accept contractualism. In the second half I try to justify two versions of liberalism from the contractualist standpoint. The first version is derived from a hypothetical agreement: if people accepted contractualism, what principle would they unanimously choose as the basic social rule? Because people have conflicting conceptions of the good and the right, they cannot agree to any particular substantive principles. The best they can do is to recognize a formal principle specifying a decision procedure: majority rule circumscribed by a few rights. The rights would be concerned with freedom from arbitrary rule, equality before the law, and conditional freedom of thought and speech. I call this principle weak liberalism. This would be universally consented to as long as people's substantive ethical conceptions are incompatible. In a weakly liberal society, if a sufficient number of people share a belief in empiricism, the second and more liberal system of norms, which I call strong liberalism, might be established through the procedure specified by weak liberalism. For this establishment, however, it is necessary to interpret empiricism and some facts in such a way that they confirm the equality of humans and freedom from control by others. If the majority approved this interpretation, strong liberalism would be justified.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 再論・企業内デモクラシー : 労働契約論を中心に
- 契約主義的リベラリズムの粗描
- 株式会社は株主のものか
- 企業内デモクラシーのための試論 : あるリベラリズムの観点から
- 契約主義の二つの根拠
- 社会契約としての道徳 : D.ゴティエの道徳理論