アリストテレスの範疇教説とCategoriae(II)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
II. Categoriaeの諸問題 (1) Cat2. 1a20-b9とTopA9. 103b23-39 (2) Cat 5章における推論 (3) 第一実体と第二実体 (4) Cat5. 3b10-23むすびIn this second part of the article. I concern myself with some difficulties in the following texts of the Categories: (1) ch. 2, 1a20-b9-Cat. makes use of " being in subject" as a criterion for the categorial distinction between substances and non-substances, and of "being said of subject" as a criterion for the inter-categorial distinction between individuals and universals, which creates ambiguity in the system of fourfold classification of beings where both criteria are used (cp. Top. A9, 103b29-39 where "being said of subject" is used both categorially for praedicamenta and inter-categorially for praedicabilia). (2) ch. 5, 2tall-b36-Cat. modifies the above "four beings" into primary substances (being neither in nor said of any subject), secondary substances (being said solely of primary substances) and accidents (being solely in primary substances) by restricting the inter-categorial use of "said of subject" in the category of substance, which must deny Top. A9 (103b37-39), SE 22 (178b37-39, 179a8-10), Met. Z13 (1039a1-2, a14-16), B6 (1003a8-9), K2 (1060b20-22), for the reason that the universal "what-is-it" essence, being other than the substantial "what-is-it" essence, expresses any one of the non-substantial attributes (otherwise the Third Man Argument will occur). (3) ch. 5, 3b10-23 Cat. modifies again secondary substances into universals that express such-and-such a substance, which does not correspond to what is described in Met. 414, Top. 46 where differentiae are said to express such-and-such a genus which in its turn expresses "what-is-it" in the definition of whatever belongs to any category.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- アリストテレス『倫理学』における自足性と友の必要性の問題 : EE.VII12とEN.IX9の比較を通じて(100集記念号)
- プシューケーの定義とアクリル
- アリストテレスの範疇教説とCategoriae(II)
- アリストテレスの範疇教説とCategoriae(I)
- アリストテレスの論理学における転換性
- アリストテレス『範疇論』の真作性再考 : イザァク・フシクの真作論を駁す
- 西洋哲学倫理学史(1)古代・中世哲学
- 西洋哲学倫理学史 (1) 古代・中世哲学
- FURTH, M., Substance, Form and Psyche : an Aristotelean Metaphysics, Pp. xiv+300, Cambridge U. P., 1988, £30.
- SANDBACH, F. M., Aristotle and the Stoics. Supplementary Volume no. 10, The Cambridge Philological Society, Pp.xi+88, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
- O'DALY, Gerard J. P., Philosophy of the Self., Pp. 121, Irish University Press, Shannon, 1973.
- 古代・中世における自己認識の問題点
- アリストテレス,アヴィセンナ,トマス・アクィナスの霊魂論比較研究 : 邦文要旨(博士論文抜萃)
- 任意な範疇概念形式としてのプレデイカビリア
- プレデイカメンタとプレデイカビリアについて