ens, essentia, esseについて

概要

論文の詳細を見る
1. ensの言語文法的概念分析2. ensの言語文法的論理分析3. ensの存在論的分析4. ensの形而上学的分析5. 実体本質の基礎づけとしての実体実存6. 「存在」の根源的根拠の問題In the philosopy of Aristotle, it is said that the substance is the most important notion. But Aristotle himself didn't make clear the metaphysical distinction between the essential substance i. e. the essence and the existential substance i. e. the existence. Thomas Aquinas also had the deep insight into the problem of the substance. He had clearly distinguished the important difference between the essence and the existence by using the word of "actus" and "potentia" which are the basic notions of the metaphysics. In "De ente et essentia", as the title shows, "esse" isn't entitled directly. But by taking into consideration on the notion of "ens" and "essentia", Thomas Aquinas had been confirming that "esse" was more basic notion for the metaphysics than "essentia". And he had finally arrived at the conclusion that "esse" (ειναι) i. e. the existence held priority to "essentia" (το τι ην ειναι, τι εστιν) i. e. the essence. I have tried in this paper to consider the basic notion of "ens", "essentia" and "esse", and to show how "esse" underlies "essentia" originally by reading the text "De ente et essentia" (and "Metaphysics").
慶應義塾大学の論文