分析哲学に対するキリスト教のアプローチの仕方 : 言語分析的立場からみた科学知と宗教知の相違

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• The main theme of this thesis is three-fold: first, the challenge to the Christian theology which concerns "provincialism." Second, the attempt to stress importance, particularly of the relation between contemporary philosophy and theology. And third, the difference between scientific knowledge and religious knowledge. More in detail, the discussion of this theme runs in turn as follows. 1. The Christian Church must be a "listening Church" to be in continual conversation with the cultural forms of the world in which it finds itself. Today a most important segment of our intellectual culture is analytical philosophy. 2. There are a number of points linguistic analysis will be able to suggest to theologians concerning the distinctively religious uses and nature of language. However, so many of our theologians seem to be either indifferent or impatient toward this type of philosophy. Why? 3. The relation of theology to philosophy has been utilitarian for many centuries. Thus, it may not be easy to establish partnership between contemporary philosophy and theology. A number of useful suggestions, however, are provided by the analysts concerning theological language. 4. A few of theologians who have been attracted by analytic philosophers seem to have been swept away by the tendency toward positivism. Thus, they claim that religious beliefs and language are non-cognitive. However, we are in line with them in the viewpoint of analysis of religious language. 5. Analysis of theological language seems to be most fruitful in analysis of the "Personal Language Game" because theological language has most in common with personal language. 6. Therefore, we focus attention on the characteristics of personal language used in speaking of God. A God we speak of is a God who reaches us as a Person. This is our personal experience. 7. The conception of religious language as personal suggests a different conception of religious knowledge from that which accompanies scientific knowledge. In personal language, explanation must be in terms of the motives or purposes of what is to be explained. Much confusion has arisen from the failure to see that causation belongs to a different language game from that in which we speak of purpose and intention. This distinction between explanation by cause and explanation by purpose is important for theological language.

• 慶應義塾大学の論文

著者

• 間瀬 啓允

  慶應義塾大学文学部

• 間瀬 啓允

  慶応義塾大学文学部

関連論文

• 生命・環境・宗教 : 将来への展望
• 医療と生命倫理(第7回日本生命倫理学会年次大会 : ワークショップ総括)
• ジョン・ヒックの宗教実在論(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
• 遠藤周作と宗教多元主義 : 『深い河』 創作日記をめぐって (遠藤周作の晩年とその文学)
• 『エコロジーと宗教』
• 宗教の哲学
• ホワイトヘッドにおけるプロセス観念の形成(100集記念号)
• ジョン・ヒックの宗教言語論
• ジョン・ヒックの宗教多元論
• ジョン・ヒックの宗教認識論
• ホワイトヘッドにおける神論の形成過程
• ウィトゲンシュタインと宗教的信念(三田哲学会例会記録)
• 形而上学成立の宗教的根拠について : 自然神学と啓示神学のかかわりの構造(三田哲学会例会発表要旨)
• 「自然と人間」に関する方法論的な考察
• 宗教言語の哲学的分析 : 世俗的思惟における宗教
• 分析哲学に対するキリスト教のアプローチの仕方 : 言語分析的立場からみた科学知と宗教知の相違
• 分析哲学とキリスト教
• 分析的宗教哲学の形成(新刊紹介)

もっと見る 閉じる

スポンサーリンク