ギリシャ諸方言の相互関係 : 東ギリシャ方言を中心として
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The traditional view that Thessalian is an eastern dialect profoundly influenced by West Greek has recently been challenged by Porzig and Risch, who, admitting Aeolic unity, recognize the western affinity of Thessalian as fundamental (i. e. original Aeolic) and maintain that the eastern character of Lesbian is secondary and due to Ionic influence. Whether their interpretation is solidly founded is briefly surveyed in the present paper. 1) Specifically Attic-Ionic characteristics are rather young. -This agrees with the view of P. & R. 2) Most of the specifically Aeolic characteristics are not innovations but conservations of older forms, so that Aeolic unity seems to be rather weak. 3) Historical Thessallian τι as in σισω-τι, the most important of the western affinity of the dialect, is not necessarily to be ascribed to a vernacular spoken in Thessaly before Doric Invasion (We may call this Old Thessalian). 4) Distinction has to be made between historical and old Thess., Lesbian being derived from the latter. 5) Aeolic innovations run up with Arcado-Cyprian. 6) We may temporarily postulate the following stages of development before Doric Invasion. I. A more or less homogeneous eastern dialect extending from Thessaly through Peloponnesus to southern islands. II. Innovations starting from Peloponnesus which eventually covered the whole domain of this dialect except Attica. III. Innovations starting from Attica towards Peloponnesus (e. g. αν, ει) which broke the unity of Aeolic and Arcado-Cyprian. IV. Arcado-Cyprian innovations.
- 日本西洋古典学会の論文
- 1960-03-29
日本西洋古典学会 | 論文
- STRAUSS, BARRY S., Athens after the Peloponnesian War. Class, Faction and Policy, 403-386 B. C., Pp.xiii+191, Croom Helm, London & Sydney, 1986., £19.95.
- クセルクセスの遠征軍の規模
- FURLEY, D., The Greek Cosmologists, Vol.1 : The Formation of the Atomic Theory and its Earliest Critics., Pp.viii+220, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987., £25.
- SWEENY, Leo, Infinity in the Presocratics. A Bibliographical and Philosophical Study., Pp. xxxiii+222, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1972.
- COLE, Th., Demoeritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. (Philological Monographs, XXV.), Pp. xii+225 S., Ohio, Western Reserve Univ. Press, 1967, $ 6.50