古典期アテナイのドキマシア(資格審査)について : その機能と民主政
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
There are two primary arguments concerning the purpose of dokimasia in the fifth and fourth century B. C Athens. Dokimasia was the process that all officials underwent before assumption of office. These officials were scrutinized by a jury to determine whether they were to be elected or chosen by lot In one argument, J W Headlam in 1891 asserted that the dokimasia was an institution to review only the official's legal qualification both as a citizen and for office. The second argument by G Adeleye refutes the above by stating that the dokimasia was primarily concerned with the candidate's loyalty to democracy and moral probity and not just a simple review of his legal qualifications. This paper attempts to determine which of the following was the actual process of dokimasia (1) was the moral probity of life taken into consideration during the dokimasia apart from a legal review? or (2) was loyalty for democracy considered along with the candidate's legal qualifications? On the first point, the candidates could not be eliminated from office just because of his immorality, since in classical Athens immoral deeds lead to atimia, i e, the loss of legal status of a citizen, which automatically eliminated him from office It seems evident that after the events of the Thirty (403 B C.) critical examination of the candidate's loyalty to democracy was necessary in addition to a review of his legal qualifications to protect democracy It can be concluded thatthe dokimasia succeeded in weeding out unqualified candidates through the examination of both moral and legal qualifications and therefore provided officials that were loyal to democracy
- 1988-03-18
論文 | ランダム
- これからの弁護士(第二部)(近畿大学法科大学院秋期講演会)
- 大規模地震と被害の状況 (特集 地震・降雨災害)
- 地震の概要および発生状況 (特集 地震・降雨災害)
- 紹介 高速道路における被災状況とその要因 (特集:新潟県中越地震)
- 矢作川橋の特殊解析