古典期アテナイのドキマシア(資格審査)について : その機能と民主政
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
There are two primary arguments concerning the purpose of dokimasia in the fifth and fourth century B. C Athens. Dokimasia was the process that all officials underwent before assumption of office. These officials were scrutinized by a jury to determine whether they were to be elected or chosen by lot In one argument, J W Headlam in 1891 asserted that the dokimasia was an institution to review only the official's legal qualification both as a citizen and for office. The second argument by G Adeleye refutes the above by stating that the dokimasia was primarily concerned with the candidate's loyalty to democracy and moral probity and not just a simple review of his legal qualifications. This paper attempts to determine which of the following was the actual process of dokimasia (1) was the moral probity of life taken into consideration during the dokimasia apart from a legal review? or (2) was loyalty for democracy considered along with the candidate's legal qualifications? On the first point, the candidates could not be eliminated from office just because of his immorality, since in classical Athens immoral deeds lead to atimia, i e, the loss of legal status of a citizen, which automatically eliminated him from office It seems evident that after the events of the Thirty (403 B C.) critical examination of the candidate's loyalty to democracy was necessary in addition to a review of his legal qualifications to protect democracy It can be concluded thatthe dokimasia succeeded in weeding out unqualified candidates through the examination of both moral and legal qualifications and therefore provided officials that were loyal to democracy
- 1988-03-18
論文 | ランダム
- 脂質代謝に及ぼすGHの作用
- 加齢に伴う糖代謝異常
- 費用便益要件が存在しない場合の行政機関による制定法解釈と司法審査--アメリカ合衆国連邦裁判所判決の検討
- クリントン政権下における大統領と行政機関の関係に関する一考察
- 地方自治法二四四条「公の施設」と個別法との関係 : 指定管理者制度の導入と図書館法(外間寛先生古稀記念論文集)