博物館資料を対象とした記述基準の分析
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In bibliographic world, there are many discussions and standards for describing bibliographic information, while in cultural heritage world, there are few discussions and no standards for describing information about museum objects. But, ICOM/CIDOC(International Council of Museum/International Committee for Documentation) develops Conceptual Reference Model(CRM) which provides definitions and a formal structure for describing the concepts and relationships used in cultural heritage documentation. And CRM are intended to cover library materials and historical materials. When users need to know information about museum objects, library materials and historical materials simultaneously, museums, libraries and archives shall prepare interoperability for information about their resources. This study aims to examine the interoperability by analyze many guidelines for describing information about museum objects with library standard, MARC21. Selected five famous guidelines are Object ID, VRA Core Categories, CDWA(Categories for the Description for Works of Arts), ICOM/CIDOC Guideline, and ICOM/CIDOC/CRM. Results are as follows; (1) While library standards depend on abstract concepts of works, guidelines for museum depend on concrete physical items. (2) To aim to serve information about materials to users, libraries need standards for describing information about materials in detail. But, museums need standards for describing physical entity in detail to aim to keep and identify objects.
- 愛知淑徳大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 書誌記述における雑誌名と機関名の扱い： : SIST 05，SIST 06の改訂による完全表記
- 「情報とドキュメンテーション」に関する標準化活動の現状(ドキュメンテーションの現在)
- 「資料(情報源)に関する情報」のための国際標準化
- 博物館資料を対象とした記述基準の分析
- IFLA/FRBRとISWC, ISTCのWork概念の比較
- 欧州の情報政策による図書館、博物館間協力の可能性
- 情報流通における標準化活動の現状と意義 (特集:情報流通の最新動向)
- 情報識別子間の階層関係と関連性についての分析
- 情報検索システムとしてのOPAC評価基準の考察