「選挙規定・立法過程・司法審査」に関する試論(松本昌悦・樅木貞雄教授退職記念号)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper studies the judicial review of law-making process of the Diet. Such review is necessary and useful particularly for election and law. The reason is because lawmaking process concerning election tends to reflect vested interests of sitting members of the Diet. Is the judicial power able to review lawmaking process of the Diet? If possible, how does a court review law-making process? What method? What are standards of the review? The Supreme Court decision-Koshiyama v. Central Election Management Council, 1849 Hanrei Jiho 9 (Sup. Ct., Jan.14, 2004) can contribute to a useful material of consideration of the review.
- 中京大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 「選挙規定・立法過程・司法審査」に関する試論(松本昌悦・樅木貞雄教授退職記念号)
- 対世効
- 釈明権・職権証拠調べ・職権探知
- 現行取消訴訟制度の非主観訴訟性
- 訴えの利益に関する《よき判例政策》 : 取消訴訟の客観化の限界と民衆訴訟
- 主観訴訟として構成された旧行政裁判制度