4 「賢明な経営者」と「賢明でない経営者」^[○!R] : 経済学と「経営教育学派の経営学」の理論的前提(経営教育と経営の新課題)

概要

論文の詳細を見る
This paper concerns the reasons why management theories should exist as against economics theories. Economics tacitly assumes existence of a "wise manager" for the purpose of its theory construction. This is not the case with a management theory. A management theory must assume the existence of a "non-wise manager," especially for management education. Such a difference in the assumptions between them is quintessential for explaining the distinctly different identities between these theories. From such a point of view, a fashionable idea such as the manager bashing is an influence of economics. In economics, the assumption is the following : "When in prosperity, high level of economic performance prevails. When in recession, low level of economic performance prevails." For a management theory, this type of assumption is not suitable. A management theory considers that a manager's behaviors are important in an organization, as performances are variable even within the same environment. In other words, a manager's ability can be understood only in these terms. However, as C.I. Barnard stated, only a few managers have such an ability. Most managers are bound to fail in actual practices. For this very reason, assumptions for "non-wise manager" is effective. This distinction leads to the development of the good management education skills.
日本マネジメント学会の論文
2006-03-30