インドネシア経済とIMF・世銀 : 構造調整・民主化・下からの開発の時代(大会報告・共通論題:新自由主義の政策展開)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper studies Indonesia's economic involvement in globalization and neo-liberalism through its relationship with the IMF and the World Bank. The IMF and World Bank were deeply involved in the set-up of the Soeharto Regime, especially in formulating the IGGI (Inter-Govermental Group on Indonesia) system that supported the Government budget every year by borrowing money. People's control over the Government was extremely weak, and national elites were plundering government resources, although they also tried to supply the people with ample consumer goods at cheaper prices. When the Government sought further financial assistance from the World Bank at the beginning of the 1980s, the World Bank attempted to apply a structural adjustment policy that deregulated the trade and investment regime in Indonesia. The deregulated banking sector promoted an in-flow of portfolio money that supported the private-sector-initiated infrastructure development and thereby boosted the economy, something that the World Bank praised in every year's report. However, monetary institutions had not developed in proportion to quantitative growth. Under poor surveillance, the banking sector made vast amounts of bad borrowing loans during the monetary crisis of 1998. In order to save the banking sector, the Government issued national bonds to the point where the national debt exceeded GDP. Based on the ideology of civil society, the IMF and World Bank prompted the Government to undertake further deregulation of trade and investment, improve the judicial system, and practice good governance. However, priority was given to the sale of big companies controlled by IBRA(Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency) to foreign investors. The IMF' s hasty policy engendered political instability that in turn cost the economy its chance of rapid revival. However, despite continuing corporate troubles and capital out-flow, the national economy recorded modest growth (4%) and solid capital formation (18%) in 2000 and 2001. Chinese capital relying on its self-financing network contributed to growth, and similar self-financing by pribumi non-Chinese capital among micro, small and medium-scale firms also developed under the economic crisis. These sectors that propped up the Indonesian economy are based on informal and community networks. These networks and newly appearing people's organizations among farmers, laborers, and small entrepreneurs, which feature in moves towards democratization and decentralization, may be able to check the negative effects of globalization and neo-liberalism in Indonesia.
- 政治経済学・経済史学会の論文
- 2002-04-20
著者
関連論文
- インドネシアにおける村落会議と村落議会─植民地期20世紀初頭における村落集会の形成と村落協議会の試み─
- インドネシア合板産業--急成長の光と影
- Access to Land in Sundanese Community: A Case Study of Upland Peasant Households in Kemang Village, West Java, Indonesia
- Assessment of People's Views of Thailand's Universal Coverage (UC): A Field Survey in Thangkwang Subdistrict, Khonkaen
- 経済危機と農民--危機対応と政府のセーフティネット・プログラム (特集 現場で語る地球の環境(第2回)アジアの農村で持続可能性を探る)
- 紹介 インドネシアの新労働法--労働力に関する法律第13号と労使紛争処理法案
- インドネシアにおける労使紛争処理制度とその紛争事例--「合議の原則」(ムシャワラー)のもとにおける労使紛争処理
- インドネシア経済とIMF・世銀 : 構造調整・民主化・下からの開発の時代(大会報告・共通論題:新自由主義の政策展開)
- グローバリゼーションとインドネシアにおける労働組合政策と労働組合
- バリ銀行スキャンダル
- インドネシア (日本における発展途上地域研究--1986〜94--地域編〔含 文献リスト〕) -- (東南アジア)
- インドネシア農村におけるプリブミ資本織布小工業の展開 : 西ジャワ・マジャ ラヤ地方の産地における小営業
- インドネシアにおける農村出身女子労働者保護問題 : 急成長輸出産業と中東への労働力輸出
- 規制緩和政策下のインドネシアにおける労働問題と労働行政 : 1980年代後半のフォーマルセクターを中心に
- Talun-Huma, Swidden Agriculture, and Rural Economy in West Java, Indonesia