日露戦後期における地域振興策とその性格 : 福島県伊達郡川俣町を事例として
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The aim of this paper is to examine the change of a town-and-village economy and a measure for the regional promotion, in addition a shaking of the social order in a region by it. Then I want to value not only the autonomy of land-owners but also the active autonomy of small-scale producers highly. After the Russo-Japanese War, Kawamata town was struck with slack of the silk textile trade as a key industry. Financial measures or the measures by the townspeople themselves, for example the foundation of firms and industrial associations, were taken to remedy situation. The industrial association, which the members had to guarantee the redemption, was established and borrowed money at low interest from the government. In the development of the measures, the upper class as a leader in the region were hoped to participate in the promotion of the silk textile industry, and had to take upon themselves responsibilities, that they were not allowed that they did not answer the expectation. They actively discharged it on one hand. But I think upper classes behavior with responsibilities was limited. On the other hand, small-scale producers in the silk texile trade with power looms claimed that the upper class fulfilled their responsbilities, in other words, that they supported the silk textile trade as a key industry all the more, for the sake of smooth management and close fighting happened between them. So, upper class who were pressured by producers were dragged into further measures for the promotion for their responsibilities. A measure for the regional promotion in the period following the Russo-Japanese War had not only the character which took place by the autonomy of land-owners and consequently, could keep the order in a town-and-village, but also the character which yielded an opportunity to foster the instability of social order in the region, by the appearance of a new pushing subject on a measure for the regional promotion, that is to say a small-scale producer.
- 政治経済学・経済史学会の論文
- 1995-04-20