ゲーム実験法の検討と非ゼロ和ゲーム再構成のこころみそのI

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Pruitt & Kimmel pointed out a peculiar status of experimental gaming research. Though gaming studies have continued to appear in major journals in immense number, the results of these studies have been largely ignored by the broader field of psychology. Thus the validity of experimental gaming studies has been doubted, and their diagnoses are lacking in theory, method-bound approach, and evidence little concern for external validity. In this article, the author firstly recriticized the critique of experimental gaming tradition made by Pruitt & Kimmel. In the author's opinion, their diagnoses are rather syndromes. These syndromes demonstrate the fundamental structure of the experimental game itself. Continuing the recritique made above, the author has questioned game-matrix, and game-matrix in laboratory, and has tried to find out what the real process in experimental game studies is. In this consideration, communicative behavior between subjects mediated by meanings has appeared as the real phenomenon. Compared to this communicative process which is ignored and distorted by researchers, the interdependence, hypothetically expressed by game-matrix, between subjects which has been supposed to be the major problem of experimental gaming is rather fictional. Then, the author has tried to re-construct a non-zero-sum game situation in which communicative behavior can be handled as the major target of these studies.
帯広畜産大学の論文
1981-03-25