減損会計基準がリース会計に与える影響(3)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper continues from "Effect of Leases by Impairment Accounting Standards (1)", and "Effect of Leases by Impairment Accounting Standards (2)" (The Journal of Asahikawa University No.57-58 Dec. 2004, and the same Journal No.59 Jun. 2005) The lease transactions are classified into the operating lease and the finance lease, according to FASB and IAS. However, the lease transactions are classified into the operating lease and the transfer ownership finance lease and the non-transfer ownership finance lease, according to Japanese standard. The transfer ownership finance lease becomes on-balance and the non-transfer ownership finance lease becomes off-balance. Then, the non-transfer ownership finance lease appropriates an impairment loss on liability. We have to compute a book value, when applying accounting for the impairment to the non-transfer ownership finance lease. In Japan, it is considered that the present value of unexpired lease fee is the book value of off-balance lease assets. However, the non-transfer ownership finance lease indicates a book value based on the acquisition cost in notes. Therefore, "remeasurement difference" will be caused if accounting for the impairment is applied to the non-transfer ownership finance lease. Accounting for the impairment does not change the book value based on the acquisition cost. However, when applying accounting for the impairment to the non-transfer ownership finance lease, the book value is measured again. And when this adjusted book value exceeds a recoverable price, the impairment loss of the non-transfer ownership finance lease is measured. Although the transfer ownership finance lease offsets the depreciation cost and the impairment loss by a new book value, the non-transfer ownership finance lease offsets the lease fee and the impairment loss. Therefore, the transfer ownership finance lease cannot offset the impairment loss of un-depreciable assets, but the non-transfer ownership finance lease can offset the impairment loss of depreciable assets and un-depreciable assets. Therefore, if adjustment is given to the transfer ownership finance lease and the non-transfer ownership finance lease, the non-transfer ownership finance lease needs to apply accounting for the impairment of assets based on the lease accounting information indicated by notes, or needs to abolish the non-transfer ownership finance lease.
- 旭川大学の論文
- 2006-06-30
著者
関連論文
- 会計的保守主義と企業結合 : 企業結合会計とのれんの減損処理
- 減損損失の損金認識過程 : 特別損失v.s.経常損失
- 減損会計基準がリース会計に与える影響(3)
- 新「会社法」成立の覚え書
- 減損会計基準がリース会計に与える影響(2)
- 減損会計基準がリース会計に与える影響(1)
- セール・リースバック会計の量質問題
- ファイナンスリース取引におけるキャッシュフロー分析と財務分析 :自己資本・借入金・ファイナンスリース取引による設備投資
- ストック・オプション会計の諸問題
- 道産和牛肥育の財務分析 : 成長性分析・生産性分析・労働分配率分析
- ビックバンと土地再評価法 : 時価主義会計の導入をめぐって
- 会計学とコーポレート・ガバナンスの接点 : 会計主体論の再考
- セール・アンド・リースバック会計 : 「益出し」対「企業金融」
- 所有権移転外ファイナンス・リースの意義とリース会計制度の妥協点 : 「リース会計の実務指針」のケーススタディの分析
- わが国におけるリース会計の発展と限界 : ノン・キャンセラブルとフル・ペイアウト
- リース会計制度と経済的実質優先の会計思考
- 金融先物取引の会計理論
- ファイナンス・リースにおけるキャッシュ・フローの比較分析
- アメリカにおける投下資本回収計算と税制改革
- バブル経済と会計 : 法律的利益と会計上の利益