生成の社会学の生成過程 : 作田社会学研究序説
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this paper is to describe the formative process of sociology of becoming in Sakuta's sociology, the constitution of the theory of Keiichi Sakuta as a whole. We select four of his main works for our examination: Sociology of Value, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Citizen and Individual, Toward Sociology of Becoming: View of Values and Character and Life Drive: from Neurosis to Perversion. Genealogy of Sakuta's Sociology [table] On the left side of the table above, we place two categories of science for his works: sociology and anthropology. The dotted line between the two categories shows that Sakuta's sociology experienced a theoretical turn between Value and Rousseau and it means that his thought has evolved from sociology to anthropology. His anthropology is what formulates the sociological theory including the insight into immediate, lived experience. In Becoming, his sociology of becoming was built up. His latest work Life Drive, which this paper doesn't cover, is the further development of the sociology of becoming. Sakuta's sociology has steadily evolved and deepened. In the first chapter, we distill the theoretical framework in Value for our purpose, and show some problems that he could not deal with in it. The point is whether we can deal with lived experience, the penetration between the subject and the object, by the theory of social system such as Persons'. Eventually, we see here that lived experience preceding meaning actually cannot be dealt with as long as we follow voluntarism of Persons' sociology. In the second chapter, we read Rousseau as a solution to these problems. There, we witness the turn of the perspective from voluntarism to ontology (based on the theory of duration in Bergsonism) to see through the depth of life, though Sakuta's theoretical framework remains implicit in that book. In the third chapter, we take Becoming and describe his theoretical framework largely embracing Bergsonism in order to clearly comprehend his sociology of becoming. We believe that a clear distinction he made in Becoming between becoming and stabilizing (teichaku) in our life contributes to the development of the sociological theory.
- 龍谷大学の論文